Consumption inequality in Canada, 1997 to 2009

Abstract

We assess the evolution of consumption inequality in Canada over the years 1997 to 2009. We correct the imputation of shelter consumption for homeowners to allow for unobserved differences in housing quality correlated with selection into rental tenure, and we account for measurement error in this imputation. Using the annual Survey of Household Spending for years 1997 to 2009, we find that household‐level consumption inequality measured by the Gini coefficient increased from 0.251 to 0.275 over 1997 to 2006. Between 2006 and 2007, consumption inequality may have decreased, and over 2007 to 2009, consumption inequality was flat. Over the entire period of 1997 to 2009, consumption inequality increased moderately. The Gini coefficient for individual‐level consumption inequality followed a similar pattern, though the changes were smaller in magnitude. We also explore a possible correction for tail non‐response bias in inequality measurement and find that the increase in measured consumption inequality is robust to this correction.

Research on Inequality of Household Consumption and Social Welfare from the Perspective of Household Non-medical Expenditure

“…(11) (10) growth;if 3  <0, it means that the distribution of consumption deteriorates, and the deterioration of consumption distribution has offset -100 3  % of the increase of social welfare brought about by the economic growth.…”

Consumption Inequality in Urban China

“…Hassett and Mathur (2012) find that American consumption inequality has increased only marginally since the 1980s and that consumption inequality has narrowed during periods of recessions, such as during the 2007-2009 recession. Norris and Pendakur (2015) In the developing world, Idrees and Ahmad (2010) find that Pakistani inequality in terms of consumption expenditures improved slightly between 1992-93 and 2004-5, but the extent of inequality in food consumption remained substantially lower than that of non-food consumption; household expenditures on education were more unequally distributed than overall consumption expenditures; healthcare expenditures in urban areas have become relatively more evenly distributed relatively in recent years, whereas the level of inequality in terms of rural healthcare expenditures has remained consistent, if not somewhat higher. Shanbhogue (2014) shows that among all the major states of India, rural consumption inequality is less than that in the urban areas, and there has been a very insignificant decline in rural consumption inequality from 2004-5 to 2009-10.…”

The heterogeneous effects of COVID‐19 on Canadian household consumption, debt and savings

“… 1 These are, respectively, the major surveys used by Statistics Canada for the distribution of household wealth and spending. See Statistics Canada table 11‐10‐0223‐01, available at www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1110022301 , Norris and Pendakur ( 2015 ) or Gellatly and Richards ( 2019 ). The SFS and SHS also provide the distributional basis for the Statistics Canada Distribution of Household Economic Accounts Social Policy Simulation Database/Model (Statistics Canada 2020a ), which we find our results broadly consistent with (Statistics Canada 2021 ).…”