2016
DOI: 10.1111/con4.12321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumption‐Based Conservation Targeting: Linking Biodiversity Loss to Upstream Demand through a Global Wildlife Footprint

Abstract: Although most conservation efforts address the direct, local causes of biodiversity loss, effective long‐term conservation will require complementary efforts to reduce the upstream economic pressures, such as demands for food and forest products, which ultimately drive these downstream losses. Here, we present a wildlife footprint analysis that links global losses of wild birds to consumer purchases across 57 economic sectors in 129 regions. The United States, India, China, and Brazil have the largest regional… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…-GLOBIO (Alkemade et al, 2009), -biodiversity footprint based on multi-region input-output (MRIO), with some variants: (a) rare species threats analysis (Lenzen et al, 2012;Moran et al, 2016;Moran and Kanemoto, 2017), (b) species range and displacement analysis (Kitzes et al, 2016) and (c) risk of species extinction analysis (Sandström et al, 2017). -ecological footprint (Borucke et al, 2013), -life cycle assessment (LCA) where damage to ecosystem diversity is considered as an area of concern (Curran et al, 2010;Goedkoop et al, 2013).…”
Section: Models For Assessing Business Impacts On Biodiversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-GLOBIO (Alkemade et al, 2009), -biodiversity footprint based on multi-region input-output (MRIO), with some variants: (a) rare species threats analysis (Lenzen et al, 2012;Moran et al, 2016;Moran and Kanemoto, 2017), (b) species range and displacement analysis (Kitzes et al, 2016) and (c) risk of species extinction analysis (Sandström et al, 2017). -ecological footprint (Borucke et al, 2013), -life cycle assessment (LCA) where damage to ecosystem diversity is considered as an area of concern (Curran et al, 2010;Goedkoop et al, 2013).…”
Section: Models For Assessing Business Impacts On Biodiversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global multi-regional input-output (MRIO) models provide a comprehensive mapping of the global supply chain network in monetary units and show how consumer demand in one country is linked to biodiversity loss in another (Lenzen et al 2012, Kitzes et al 2017, Moran and Kanemoto 2017, Verones et al 2017, Wilting et al 2017. However, the commodity details of MRIOs are too low to allow studying footprints of specific products such as different oil crops and vegetable oils (Wiedmann et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…International trade has indeed been shown to cause negative impacts on biodiversity among lowincome exporting countries (Lenzen et al 2012). Increasing number of studies have further evaluated the strong implications of international trade on biodiversity (Chaudhary and Kastner 2016, Kitzes et al 2016, Nishijima et al 2016, Chaudhary et al 2017, Moran and Kanemoto 2017. Similarly, international trade can generate biodiversity impacts through the introduction of harmful nonindigenous species (Hulme 2009), sometimes even directly associated to the act of trading such as invasive species transported through ship ballast water (Drake and Lodge 2004).…”
Section: Telecoupling Through Trade In Global Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%