2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmp.2019.100633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consuming dystopic places: What answers are we looking for?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, it seems that in this era of rediscovering and reinventing death within the tourism spectrum, the role of the witness appears rather limiting especially if the offered product is staged or touristified (Cohen, 2011). Most literature on dark tourism has exhaustively focused on either a) what tourists witness in terms of typology of sites like prisons (Strange and Kempa, 2003), battlefields (Miles, 2014), or entire countries as North Korea (Buda and Shim, 2015), or b) why they choose to, passing from the pro-visit motivational spectrum (Biran et al, 2011;Gillen 2018) to a more general basis (Stone, 2006;Light, 2017), or c) to a lesser degree, the affective result of the experience to the Self during and postvisit (Martini and Buda, 2018;Farkic, 2020). These typologies of sites and motivations have been structured through a 'continuum of intensity' (Seaton, 1996:240;Stone, 2006) from light to darker, based on temporal dimension or what Lennon and Foley (2000) mentioned as chronological distance from death, and site association with death (Miles, 2002).…”
Section: Being a Dark Tourist: From Voyeur To Performermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet, it seems that in this era of rediscovering and reinventing death within the tourism spectrum, the role of the witness appears rather limiting especially if the offered product is staged or touristified (Cohen, 2011). Most literature on dark tourism has exhaustively focused on either a) what tourists witness in terms of typology of sites like prisons (Strange and Kempa, 2003), battlefields (Miles, 2014), or entire countries as North Korea (Buda and Shim, 2015), or b) why they choose to, passing from the pro-visit motivational spectrum (Biran et al, 2011;Gillen 2018) to a more general basis (Stone, 2006;Light, 2017), or c) to a lesser degree, the affective result of the experience to the Self during and postvisit (Martini and Buda, 2018;Farkic, 2020). These typologies of sites and motivations have been structured through a 'continuum of intensity' (Seaton, 1996:240;Stone, 2006) from light to darker, based on temporal dimension or what Lennon and Foley (2000) mentioned as chronological distance from death, and site association with death (Miles, 2002).…”
Section: Being a Dark Tourist: From Voyeur To Performermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pro-visit motivational spectrum has been widely investigated whether in specific case studies (Biran et al, 2011;Kidron, 2013;Gillen 2018) or on a general basis (Stone, 2006;Light, 2017), presenting motivations such as education (Thurnell-Read, 2009), curiosity (Biran et al, 2011), remembrance (Farmaki, 2013), sense of duty (Thurnell-Read, 2009) or a 'must-see' site (Isaac and Çakmak, 2016). The affective result of the experience to the Self during and post-visit is still under study (Kidron, 2013;Martini and Buda, 2018;Farkic, 2020). Whether for educational, recreational, or affective motives, dark sites seem to mushroom within the tourism market and even though an important amount of literature demonstrates that relation, less has been investigated on the particular role that the tourists are asked to act upon in dark sites, that is, how they participate.…”
Section: Being a Dark Tourist: From Voyeur To Performermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alongside the development of initial definitions and typologies, there has been a growing interest and effort to identify sub-forms of dark tourism and, therefore, a myriad of different conceptualizations have emerged over the past decades, such as dystopian dark tourism (Farkić, 2020; Podoshen et al , 2015), disaster tourism (Robbie, 2008; Yankovska & Hannam, 2013) and nuclear tourism (Gusterson, 2004; Hryhorczuk, 2019). A consensus has not been reached regarding the definition of the phenomenon nor its relation to heritage studies generally (Lennon, 2017; Light, 2017).…”
Section: The Place Of Dark Tourism In Heritage Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the long-term and far-reaching social, cultural and economic effects of the disaster: health impairments, the trauma brought by the evacuation, the loss of jobs, social networks and places of historical value, it has not remained unnoticed in the social sciences or humanities either (Stone, 2013; Yankovska & Hannam, 2013; Yankovska & Hannam, 2018). Phenomenological, autoethnographical inquiries into visitors’ embodied responses, interpretation processes and engagements with the sites of dark and difficult heritage have recently acquired more academic attention (Farkić, 2020; Farkić & Kennell, 2021; Hryhorczuk, 2019; Rush-Cooper, 2020). These studies diversify the knowledge on embodiment and senses behind the tourists’ site experience and in the construction of the site knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Postmodern contexts for the growth of dark tourism (Powell & Kennell, 2016) offer competing conceptualizations of this, in the context of increasing interest in utopian and dystopian visions of the world (Farkic, 2020;Podoshen et al, 2015). There is no agreement in the literature about the categorizations of dark tourism motivations, and all that can be certain is that there are a wide variety of these (Raine, 2013;Isaac & Cakmak, 2014).…”
Section: Dark Tourism and Heritage Tourismmentioning
confidence: 99%