2010
DOI: 10.2752/175174110x12665093381540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumers to Combatants? British Uniforms and Identities, 1914–18

Abstract: By the outbreak of the First World War, glamorous military uniforms and accoutrements already had a long history «f luring men into the armed forces. They also played a central role in the process of transforming raw recruits into servicemen, instilling a sense of separation from civilians, and fostering esprit de corps. The purpose of this article is to investigate further the supposed differences between uniforms and civilian garments. Focusing on the experiences of British servicemen who volunteered or were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The notion of uniform has been crucial to how men in the UK dress for at least the past 100 years (although uniforms have been around for far longer in military and non-military settings), with cultural notions of masculinity (and indeed hegemonic masculinitysee Connell, 2005), appropriateness and rebellion all performed and construed through a relationship with uniform. Items as disparate as lounge suits and bomber jackets through to the stage costumes of glam rock stars and new romantic musicians have all taken cues from military garments (see Breward, 2016; see also Craik, 2003;Ugolini, 2010). There is an element here of belonging, whether this is to a particular group, regiment, country or ideal.…”
Section: Uniformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion of uniform has been crucial to how men in the UK dress for at least the past 100 years (although uniforms have been around for far longer in military and non-military settings), with cultural notions of masculinity (and indeed hegemonic masculinitysee Connell, 2005), appropriateness and rebellion all performed and construed through a relationship with uniform. Items as disparate as lounge suits and bomber jackets through to the stage costumes of glam rock stars and new romantic musicians have all taken cues from military garments (see Breward, 2016; see also Craik, 2003;Ugolini, 2010). There is an element here of belonging, whether this is to a particular group, regiment, country or ideal.…”
Section: Uniformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…while concealing others (class, and other forms of social status); it serves as a symbol of legitimacy and marks the wearer as harbouring special skills and prerogatives; and it suppresses, or at least sublimates (Bhugra & Silva, 1996;Craik, 2003), individual idiosyncrasy. These processes serve as mechanisms of social placement which provides a framework for mutually negotiated forms of social interaction (Paperman, 2003), including self-formation (Matthews David, 2003;Streicher, 2012;Ugolini, 2010), transgression (Craik, 2005), and resistance (De Camargo, 2016).…”
Section: General Social Function and Historical Context Of The Police Uniformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is seen as a barrier, which ensures that each member of the organization will act according to their function and be perceived as important parts of their professional identity [15,16]. In military sector, besides the status, it plays an important role in the process of transforming the inexperienced and untrained recruit into a member of the military force [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%