2020 8th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/citsm50537.2020.9268826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer Trust to Buy Green Product: Investigation of Green Perceived Value with Green Satisfaction Mediation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the research showed results of 0.579 for GPI, 0.275 for GS, 0.555 for GT and 0.460 for GW; thus, it could be affirmed that the values of the endogenous latent variables of the inner model are moderate [93]. Bootstrapping was then performed with 5000 samples for p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 in order to determine the relationship between the variables [66]. In this regard, it could be verified by the proposed analysis that all hypotheses were accepted for a p < 0.05, but not for a p < 0.01, where hypothesis H8 was rejected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of the research showed results of 0.579 for GPI, 0.275 for GS, 0.555 for GT and 0.460 for GW; thus, it could be affirmed that the values of the endogenous latent variables of the inner model are moderate [93]. Bootstrapping was then performed with 5000 samples for p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 in order to determine the relationship between the variables [66]. In this regard, it could be verified by the proposed analysis that all hypotheses were accepted for a p < 0.05, but not for a p < 0.01, where hypothesis H8 was rejected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Finally, H6, which assessed the relationship of GS → GW, had a β of 0.57, the relationship of GT → GPI, H5, showed a β of 0.32, and H7, GS → GPI, yielded a result of 0.65 (see Table 6). Bootstrapping was then performed with 5000 samples for p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 in order to determine the relationship between the variables [66]. In this regard, it could be verified by the proposed analysis that all hypotheses were accepted for a p < 0.05, but not for a p < 0.01, where hypothesis H8 was rejected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chen et al, and Ariffin et al, describe it as a ‘comprehensive evaluation of green products by consumers’ after comparing the perceived environmental benefits and costs included in the green consumption process [ 23 , 50 ]. As research in this area continues to progress, scholars have primarily focused on delineating green perceived value theories from both one-dimensional and multidimensional perspectives [ 12 , 51 , 52 ]. Overall, this study describes green perceived value as the comprehensive evaluation of green food after comparing its benefits for the consumers, such as environmental protection and nutritional value, during the purchase process, with the costs, such as time, money, and effort green food consumption includes.…”
Section: Research Hypothesis and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of consumer behavior studies, have been shown to encourage individuals to exhibit green buying and consumption behaviors (Zhou et al, 2013). Therefore, it can be concluded when consumers have strong level of environment responsibility and there are no barriers in purchasing environmentally friendly products (Lutfie & Marcelino, 2020). They'll be more inclined to set green consumption (purchasing) intention (Yen et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%