1998
DOI: 10.1108/02652329810241401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer trade‐offs among mortgage instrument variables

Abstract: With the development of increasingly complex mortgage instruments, the process by which consumers choose among these instruments also increases in importance. The real estate literature does not address how consumers of mortgage instruments make trade-offs among the different instruments. The study controlled for interest rates, and looked at five variables: number of points, additional fees, reputation of lender, type of mortgage (FRM vs. ARM), and term in years of mortgage. Using conjoint analysis it is foun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gomez Arias, 1996;Danaher, 1997;Ostrom and Iacobucci, 1995;Rosko et al, 1985;Talaga and Buch, 1998;Zinkhan and Zinkhan, 1990). However conventional conjoint approaches only allow the manipulation of limited numbers of attributes and do not distinguish dimensions from attributes.…”
Section: Advantages Over Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gomez Arias, 1996;Danaher, 1997;Ostrom and Iacobucci, 1995;Rosko et al, 1985;Talaga and Buch, 1998;Zinkhan and Zinkhan, 1990). However conventional conjoint approaches only allow the manipulation of limited numbers of attributes and do not distinguish dimensions from attributes.…”
Section: Advantages Over Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study has been carried out using conjoint analysis, a technique that, in the financial field, has been used to identify the criteria that consumers take into account when selecting a certain financial institution (Bigné & Sánchez, ; García & Chamorro, ; García, Chamorro, & Barroso, ; Ulengin, ), the quality of service (Dauda & Lee, ; Oppewal & Vriens, ), point of sale card reader for retailers (Gómez‐Arias, ), the criteria for contracting credit cards (Baherí, Dalvand, Ansarinejad, Miri‐Nargesi, & Hatami‐Shirkouhi, ; Kara, Kaynak, & Kucukemiroglu, ; Kara, Kaynak, & Kucukemiroglu, ), the contracting of financial products aimed at students (Mankila, ), the choice of plans for pensions (Choi, Ko, & Sohn, ), the taking out of a mortgage (Talaga & Buch, ), the valuation of the banking services offered through a mobile device (Mishra & Bisht, ), and the purchase of shares (Clark‐Murphy & Soutar, ). As far as we are aware, it has not yet been used to analyse the opening of savings products such as deposits.…”
Section: Objective and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Borrowers main focus is the on the size of the payments (Scanlon, Lunde and Whitehead, 2008). Customers prefer or desire the mortgage, which has no additional fees (Talaga and Buch, 1998). Mortgagors hold a prepayment option and it has the direct effect on the decision of the customers (Charlier and Bussel, 2003).…”
Section: Cost Of Mortgagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preferable characteristics of mortgage product also vary. Customers compare the total features of the mortgage product of one provider with the other (Talaga & Buch, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%