2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer perception and emotional responses to plant-based cheeses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This age group associated the authenticity of cheese with its nutritional properties in the “health” category ( p < 0.05). Authors such as Maitiniyazi and Canavari (2021) and Falkeisen et al . (2022) observed a relationship between marital status and the perception of cheese health by this age group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This age group associated the authenticity of cheese with its nutritional properties in the “health” category ( p < 0.05). Authors such as Maitiniyazi and Canavari (2021) and Falkeisen et al . (2022) observed a relationship between marital status and the perception of cheese health by this age group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emotional responses have been found to be able to differentiate products beyond hedonic measurements [ 130 ]. A study investigating PBCs asked consumers to evaluate both their emotional responses and the products’ sensory properties [ 95 ], and found that positive emotions were associated with liking. However, the study did not include extrinsic cues.…”
Section: Review Of Sensory Evaluation Methods Used and Future Conside...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key property of cheese is its melting behavior. A study investigated the consumer acceptability of five commercially available PBCs in both raw and melted forms [ 95 ]. The PBCs were evaluated using hedonic scales and CATA.…”
Section: Textural Properties Of Plant-based Alternativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the hedonic scales and general labeled magnitude scale were compared using a paired t ‐test. The results of the CATA question were analyzed as outlined in Falkeisen et al (2022). Frequencies of selection of each attribute were determined by counting the number of participants that used the attribute to describe each sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%