Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: A systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects

Abstract

To assess the effects of consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services. We updated a review published in 2006 and 2009 and revised the previous search strategies for key databases (The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; MEDLINE; EMBASE; PsycINFO; CINAHL; Web of Science) up to February 2020. Selection criteria included randomised controlled trials assessing consumer engagement in developing health care policy, research, or health services. The International Association for Public Participation, Spectrum of Public Participation was used to identify, describe, compare and analyse consumer engagement. Outcome measures were effects on people; effects on the policy/research/health care services; or process outcomes. We included 23 randomised controlled trials with a moderate or high risk of bias, involving 136,265 participants. Most consumer engagement strategies adopted a consultative approach during the development phase of interventions, targeted to health services. Based on four large cluster-randomised controlled trials, there is evidence that consumer engagement in the development and delivery of health services to enhance the care of pregnant women results in a reduction in neonatal, but not maternal, mortality. From other trials, there is evidence that involving consumers in developing patient information material results in material that is more relevant, readable and understandable for patients, and can improve knowledge. Mixed effects are reported of consumer-engagement on the development and/or implementation of health professional training. There is some evidence that using consumer interviewers instead of staff in satisfaction surveys can have a small influence on the results. There is some evidence that consumers may have a role in identifying a broader range of health care priorities that are complementary to those from professionals. There is some evidence that consumer engagement in monitoring and evaluating health services may impact perceptions of patient safety or quality of life. There is growing evidence from randomised controlled trials of the effects of consumer engagement on the relevance and positive outcomes of health policy, research and services. Health care consumers, providers, researchers and funders should continue to employ evidence-informed consumer engagement in their jurisdictions, with embedded evaluation. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018102595.

A Rapid Review of the Factors That Influence Service User Involvement in Interprofessional Education, Practice, and Research

“…Service users are those who use or are affected by the services provided by healthcare workers, including clients and their carers [ 3 ]. Often, service user involvement in healthcare is also referred to as consumer involvement [ 4 ], patient and consumer engagement [ 5 ], patient involvement [ 6 ], and patient participation [ 7 ]. In principle, it embodies person-centered care where service users are included in decision making related to the services they receive.…”

A systematic review on the use of action research methods in mental health nursing care

“…However, in the case of mental health nursing, only half of the studies included users. This is also the case in other contexts, where there are still a small number of studies in which equal groups are formed between researchers and other stakeholders, not only in the design of the study but also in the selection of participants and data collection and analysis (Effendy et al, 2022;Wiles et al, 2022). From a methodological perspective, it is important to emphasize that although there are different approaches to action research (Rowell et al, 2017), the results of the review indicate that in the field of mental health nursing the commonly used method is Participatory Action Research.…”

Australian arm of the International Spinal Cord Injury (Aus-InSCI) Community Survey: 2. Understanding the lived experience in people with spinal cord injury

“…The engagement and participation of a broad range of research partners (from health services, government agencies and non-government SCI consumer organisations) provides a powerful vehicle for advocacy, dissemination, codesign and translation of the study’s findings into practice improvement and policy change, taking into account the local and national context. There is growing evidence from randomised controlled trials of the value of evidence-informed consumer engagement on achievement of relevant and positive outcomes of health policy, research and services, with embedded evaluation [ 47 ]. Further, partnering with peers to challenge social paradigms of disability and societal attitudes could be complemented by education and media campaigns to reduce discrimination and promote social inclusivity.…”