“…Secondly, we know that navigating moral complexity is difficult for consumers (Devinney et al 2010;Geisler and Veresiu 2014;Henry 2010;Luedicke et al 2010) and recent scholarship has indicated that consumers are tasked with the 'impossible': 'to enjoy, provide, realize yourself, be authentic but also recycle, protect workers in China, prevent illegal arms trading, end the killing of animals, and so on, all in order to save capitalism from digging its own grave', (Carrington et al 2016, p. 32). Therein, calls to 'downshift', 'voluntary simplify' and 'decelerate' affluent consumer lifestyles (Etzioni 1998;Husemann and Eckhardt 2018;Schor 1998), alongside other morally moderating behaviours such as 'ethical consumption' (Devinney et al 2010), suggest that a dichotomy might exist between morality and pleasure; the emphasis of "hedonic, self-interested outcomes, in contrast to the more societal-centered viewpoint of ethical consumers", Shiu 2003, p. 1485). Alongside illuminating the process of ethical decision making, alternative hedonism would instead view pleasure and morality as two sides of the same coin, rather than diametric opposites (Shaw and Shiu 2003).…”