2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10603-020-09471-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer Debt Prevention and Discharge in the Arabian Gulf

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, accruing debt is only permissible and considered a serious matter in cases of absolute necessities and brings benefits and facilitates life improvements (Othman et al, 2013). Therefore, under Sharia, consumer indebtedness that causes insolvency is prohibited (Burton, 2021).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, accruing debt is only permissible and considered a serious matter in cases of absolute necessities and brings benefits and facilitates life improvements (Othman et al, 2013). Therefore, under Sharia, consumer indebtedness that causes insolvency is prohibited (Burton, 2021).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foreign investment has driven the growth of the fintech industry in Indonesia, with investors from China being the most dominant group of shareholders (making up 38 per cent of identified OJK-registered companies in 2018), notably following a "gold rush" due to stricter regulations at home (Tritto et al 2020). On the other hand, since Indonesia implements a dual financial system (one which considers both the conventional and Islamic financial frameworks) (Syarif 2019), which is an outcome of the aspired development of the "Islamic economy project" (Choiruzzad 2013) as in other Muslim societies (Burton 2021), the "Sharia-based" fintech lending has been made available (there were 10 already OJK-registered companies as of 2021) to cater for the Muslim majority population who prefers it to the "conventional" fintech service. Compared to the conventional fintech loan, which has received many criticisms for customer protection failures, the Sharia fintech has received little media coverage regarding customers' experiences, apart from how it is portrayed to be "distinct" in service (namely, not imposing riba (interests) -only fees for the facilitation technologies and proscribing intimidation in the event of delayed repayment, following Islamic values) (National Sharia Board-Indonesian Ulema Council 2018).…”
Section: Fintech Lending Landscape In Indonesiamentioning
confidence: 99%