2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8116(00)00005-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer choice behavior in online and traditional supermarkets: The effects of brand name, price, and other search attributes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
477
2
25

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 743 publications
(546 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
15
477
2
25
Order By: Relevance
“…Lynch et al, 2001;Swaminathan et al, 1999), recognizability and/or desirability of brand (e.g. Degeratu et al, 2000), and time delay/ download speed (e.g. Yoo and Donthu, 2001).…”
Section: Appeal Of Website Features: Past Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lynch et al, 2001;Swaminathan et al, 1999), recognizability and/or desirability of brand (e.g. Degeratu et al, 2000), and time delay/ download speed (e.g. Yoo and Donthu, 2001).…”
Section: Appeal Of Website Features: Past Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, citation counts from the business and economics literature as a whole clearly show that Heckman's work has been equally, if not more, influential. Specifically, we did not find a cite to Heckman's classic 1979 paper on selection bias in any key marketing papers on consideration sets except for Degeratu et al (2000); but their treatment of selection bias involved their respondent sample, not their choice sets. Other marketing papers exploring aspects of selection effects include Winer (1983) who looks at selection bias due to participants dropping out of panels; Krishnamurthi and Raj (1988) on the need to model the discrete choice of whether to purchase a product is linked to the continuous choice of how much to purchase; Moe and Schweidel (2012) who look at section effects in terms of how prior posts influences who posts on product review boards, and Salisbury et al (2013) who show selection effects can occur in market experiments even when random assignment at the initial stage is possible.…”
Section: Continuous Casementioning
confidence: 73%
“…Mobil uygulama tercihinde etkili olan faktörler olarak çevrimiçi benzer çalışmalara paralel olarak fiyatın etkisi, marka ismi ve kulaktan kulağa pazarlama gibi unsurlar ve kullanıcıların verdikleri puanlar ve yorumlarının satın alma niyetine etki ettiği görülmüştür (Carare, 2012;Degeratu, Rangaswamy ve Wu, 2000;Liang, Li, Yang ve Wang, 2015). Ayrıca mobil uygulama alanındaki sınırlı sayıda çalışmada uygulamanın arayüz tasarımı gibi unsurların da tercih üzerinde etkisi olduğu görülmüştür (Ghose ve Han, 2014).…”
Section: Li̇teratür Taramasiunclassified