2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaesx.2020.100033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumed tectonic plates in Southeast Asia: Markers from the Mesozoic to early Cenozoic stratigraphic units in the northern and central Philippines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to our tomographic model, we infer that the detachment of the Pacific slab occurred in two stages and 10). At the first stage, the detached Pacific slab lied beneath the West Philippine Basin between 15° and 25°N (Figures 6i-6k and 7a-7h), concordant with the paleolatitudinal location of the Shikoku and Parece-Vela basins when they initiated at ∼30 Ma (Sdrolias et al, 2004) as suggested by reconstruction models (e.g., Queaño et al, 2020;Wu et al, 2016). At the second stage, the detached Pacific slab was suited between 16° and 20°N under the northern Mariana Trough (Figures 6i-6k and 7a-7h).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…According to our tomographic model, we infer that the detachment of the Pacific slab occurred in two stages and 10). At the first stage, the detached Pacific slab lied beneath the West Philippine Basin between 15° and 25°N (Figures 6i-6k and 7a-7h), concordant with the paleolatitudinal location of the Shikoku and Parece-Vela basins when they initiated at ∼30 Ma (Sdrolias et al, 2004) as suggested by reconstruction models (e.g., Queaño et al, 2020;Wu et al, 2016). At the second stage, the detached Pacific slab was suited between 16° and 20°N under the northern Mariana Trough (Figures 6i-6k and 7a-7h).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Recently, Queaño et al. (2020) implicitly suggested that the SCS and the eastern PSP were geographically close to each other at ∼30 Ma but did not consider the possible dynamic linkage between the SCS and the eastern PSP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these two models did not involve in the geographical affinity between the SCS and the Eastern PSP. Recently, Queaño et al (2020) implicitly suggested that the SCS and the eastern PSP were geographically close to each other at ∼30 Ma but did not consider the possible dynamic linkage between the SCS and the eastern PSP.…”
Section: Coeval Evolution Of the Sb And The Scsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Philippine Sea Plate is uniquely located among the Eurasian, Pacific, and Indo-Australian plates, and is of great importance to fundamental plate tectonic theory and global tectonic evolution (Hall, 2002;Reagan et al, 2010;Wu et al, 2016;Maunder et al, 2020;Sibuet et al, 2021). The Philippine Sea Plate is not only a natural laboratory for the study of plate tectonics on aspects of initial subduction, arc rifting, and back-arc spreading (Reagan et al, 2010;Arculus et al, 2015;Maunder et al, 2020;Chen et al, 2021;Li et al, 2021) but is also significant for the tectonic reconstruction of the West Pacific and East Asia (Hall, 2002;Zahirovic et al, 2014;Lallemand, 2016;Wu et al, 2016;Ma et al, 2019;Queaño et al, 2020;Liu et al, 2021;Sibuet et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%