Abstract:Aim: To study the expectations and experiences of adolescents when in consultation with doctors, particularly with regard to issues of confidentiality. Methods: In a cross‐sectional study, 613 seventh‐ and ninth‐grade students (347 students aged 13 y and 266 students aged 15 y) completed a 40‐item questionnaire specifically developed for this study. Students anonymously completed the self‐administered questionnaire at school. Results: Of these adolescents, 89% aged 13 y and 57% aged 15 y were accompanied by on… Show more
“…This percentage is independent of the work environment (p=0.09), gender (p=0.43) and age of the paediatrician (p=0.90). These data are in alignment with the study of Rutishauser et al, performed in Switzerland, stating that paediatricians offer in 33-52% of the consultations with adolescents a private moment [22]. The adoption of this recommendation in the day-to-day practice should not present a major obstacle, since the majority of parents, if adequately informed, see the point of the advantage of such a private moment during consultation [16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This figure is even lower that the already low incidence of 9% in Israel, as reported by Urkin et al [27]. Unaccompanied visits are widely practiced and accepted by the parents and the public opinion [22,26]. Information campaigns focussing on the target population of adolescents are needed to increase the number of unaccompanied visits [26].…”
Confidentiality is a major issue in adolescent healthcare, and its perceived absence may be the main barrier for an adolescent to seek medical care. Little is known about the right on informative privacy and confidentiality for adolescents in Belgium, although these rights are unambiguously foreseen in the law on patients' rights since 2002. There are no data available regarding the introduction of a private moment with the physician during a consultation, about the nature and the quantity of information made available to parents by the paediatricians regarding the health situation of adolescents and about the existence of procedures with regard to these matters. The purpose of this study is to map out the current interpretation and the attitude of the paediatrician with regard to the right to confidentiality and informative privacy. The answers of 117 Flemish paediatricians to an anonymous questionnaire were analyzed. An unaccompanied medical visit is not frequent in Belgium (only 1%). Only 35.1% of the paediatricians systematically offer the possibility to have a private conversation with an adolescent. Almost 80% of the paediatricians render, as a rule, all information to the parents. Parents are informed about sensible information regarding psychosocial aspects, including data concerning sexual behaviour, in not less than 83.2% of the consultations by adolescents. Only in 2.9% no information is given to the parents. The paediatricians employ only for 13% the procedures regarding confidentiality for minors. This study reveals that Flemish paediatricians have a paternalistic attitude concerning the right on confidentiality and informative privacy, which is not in line with the Belgian legislation. Paediatricians offer only seldom the possibility for a private conversation to the adolescent. The small incidence of unaccompanied medical consultations contributes to this. Proper application of the legal context, the handling of the watertight procedures and the necessary communication in this respect is indispensable for the confidence and will lower the barrier for adolescents to use the healthcare system.
“…This percentage is independent of the work environment (p=0.09), gender (p=0.43) and age of the paediatrician (p=0.90). These data are in alignment with the study of Rutishauser et al, performed in Switzerland, stating that paediatricians offer in 33-52% of the consultations with adolescents a private moment [22]. The adoption of this recommendation in the day-to-day practice should not present a major obstacle, since the majority of parents, if adequately informed, see the point of the advantage of such a private moment during consultation [16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This figure is even lower that the already low incidence of 9% in Israel, as reported by Urkin et al [27]. Unaccompanied visits are widely practiced and accepted by the parents and the public opinion [22,26]. Information campaigns focussing on the target population of adolescents are needed to increase the number of unaccompanied visits [26].…”
Confidentiality is a major issue in adolescent healthcare, and its perceived absence may be the main barrier for an adolescent to seek medical care. Little is known about the right on informative privacy and confidentiality for adolescents in Belgium, although these rights are unambiguously foreseen in the law on patients' rights since 2002. There are no data available regarding the introduction of a private moment with the physician during a consultation, about the nature and the quantity of information made available to parents by the paediatricians regarding the health situation of adolescents and about the existence of procedures with regard to these matters. The purpose of this study is to map out the current interpretation and the attitude of the paediatrician with regard to the right to confidentiality and informative privacy. The answers of 117 Flemish paediatricians to an anonymous questionnaire were analyzed. An unaccompanied medical visit is not frequent in Belgium (only 1%). Only 35.1% of the paediatricians systematically offer the possibility to have a private conversation with an adolescent. Almost 80% of the paediatricians render, as a rule, all information to the parents. Parents are informed about sensible information regarding psychosocial aspects, including data concerning sexual behaviour, in not less than 83.2% of the consultations by adolescents. Only in 2.9% no information is given to the parents. The paediatricians employ only for 13% the procedures regarding confidentiality for minors. This study reveals that Flemish paediatricians have a paternalistic attitude concerning the right on confidentiality and informative privacy, which is not in line with the Belgian legislation. Paediatricians offer only seldom the possibility for a private conversation to the adolescent. The small incidence of unaccompanied medical consultations contributes to this. Proper application of the legal context, the handling of the watertight procedures and the necessary communication in this respect is indispensable for the confidence and will lower the barrier for adolescents to use the healthcare system.
“…5,16,22,23 Expert guidelines recommend routine discussions of confi dentiality protections, including the limitations of confi dentiality protections, with both adolescents and their parents. 7 The self-report data in this study suggest clinicians perceive that they routinely explain confi dentiality to youth but are much less likely to include parents in the discussion.…”
PURPOSE Clinician time alone with an adolescent has a major impact on disclosure of risk behavior. This study sought to describe primary care clinicians' patterns of delivering time alone, decision making about introducing time alone to adolescents and their parents, and experiences delivering confi dential services.
METHODSWe undertook qualitative interviews with 18 primary care clinicians in urban health centers staffed by specialists in pediatrics, family medicine, and adolescent medicine.
RESULTSThe annual preventive care visit is the primary context for provision of time alone with adolescents; clinicians consider the parent-child dynamic and the nature of the chief complaint for including time alone during visits for other than preventive care. Time constraints are a major barrier to offering time alone more frequently. Clinicians perceive that parental discomfort with time alone is rare. Many clinicians wrestle with internal confl ict about providing confi dential services to adolescents with serious health threats and regard their role as facilitating adolescent-parent communication. Health systems factors can interfere with delivery of confi dential services, such as inconsistent procedures for determining whether unaccompanied youth would be seen.CONCLUSION Despite competing time demands, clinicians report commitment to offering time alone during preventive care visits and infrequently offer it at other times. Experienced clinicians can gain skills in the art of managing complex relationships between adolescents and their parents. Offi ce systems should be developed that enhance the consistency of delivery of confi dential services.
“…Dans ce cas il y a aussi un déséquilibre entre ce qu'offrent les professionnels de la santé et ce qu'attendent d'eux leurs jeunes patients. Une étude suisse signalait que moins de 40% des médecins avaient discuté de la confidentialité avec leurs patients, alors que plus de 79% d'entre ces jeunes, âgés de 13-15 ans, pensaient que c'était pourtant important de le faire [6].…”
Le mésusage d'alcool par les jeunes est une préoccupation majeure de santé publique. Les données des enquêtes Health Behavior in School-Children (HBSC), concernant la Suisse, indiquent que la prévalence de jeunes de 15 ans indiquant ayant eu au moins deux alcoolisations au cours de leur vie est restée relativement stable parmi les garçons, entre 1998 (28%) et 2010 (27%), tandis qu'elle a légèrement augmenté chez les filles (de 16% à 20% pour les mêmes années) [1,2].
Quelques tuyaux Les impressions cliniques peuvent ne pas toujours être exactes
Assurez la confidentialitéPour que les jeunes puissent répondre de manière fiable à vos questions sur leurs comportements, il faudra leur assurer que ce qui va être dit restera entre
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.