Constructs of social and emotional effectiveness: Different labels, same content?

Schlegel, Katja; Grandjean, Didier; Scherer, Klaus R.

doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.02.005

Cited by 32 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 20 publications

(32 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Given the criticisms surrounding trait EI (e.g., Antonakis, 2004;Conte, 2005;Harms & Credé, 2010;Schulte et al, 2004;Schlegel et al, 2013;Van Rooy et al, 2005), it was imperative to enrich the literature of the field by systematically investigating the extent to which the construct has incremental predictive utility. Although small, the overall effect-size confirms the distinctiveness and theoretical importance of trait EI.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Incremental Validity of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Andrei

Siegling

Aloe

et al. 2015

Journal of Personality Assessment

176

143

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Incremental Validity of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Andrei

Siegling

Aloe

et al. 2015

Journal of Personality Assessment

176

143

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In Buhrmester et al's (1988) developmental work, the ICQ demonstrated adequate test-retest stability, with Pearson correlation r's ranging from .69 to .89. None of the non-U.S. studies conducted with the ICQ (i.e., Górska, 2011;Kanning, 2006, Schlegel et al, 2013, however, had yet replicated this finding, in that none addressed test-retest reliability. Our Study 2, thus, is the first to confirm the fair to excellent temporal stability of the ICQ also from a non-U.S. context.…”

Section: Versions Of the Interpersonalmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…For example, a German (Kanning, 2006), a Polish (Górska, 2011), and a French (Schlegel, Grandjean, & Scherer, 2013) versions were recently introduced and examined. In Buhrmester et al's (1988) original studies, the internal consistency of the ICQ scales ranged from .77 to .87 (Cronbach's alpha), and a series of factor analyses confirmed the hypothesized, five-factor structure of the ICQ.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validity and Reliability of the Interpersonal Competence Questionnaire: Empirical Evidence from an Italian Study

Giromini

Campora

Brusadelli

et al. 2015

J Psychopathol Behav Assess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:Interpersonal competence is crucial to human life, and poor social functioning is a typical feature of various psychopathological conditions. Given the relevance of the construct, increasing attention has recently been paid to the Interpersonal Competence Questionnaire (ICQ; Buhrmester et al., 1988), a 40-item self-report measuring five domains of interpersonal competence. To provide additional data on the cross-cultural adaptability of the ICQ, we developed an Italian version and investigated its psychometric properties with two independent student samples. Respondents were mostly women (about three quarters), ranging in age from 18 to 57. Study 1 (n = 408) tested factor structure, internal consistency, and convergent validity. Study 2 (n = 59) investigated test-retest reliability. Taken together, the results of both these studies provided support for the cross-cultural applicability of the ICQ, and revealed interesting associations between interpersonal competence and constructs such as well-being, emotion dysregulation and empathy. Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems CorporationDear Dr. Iselin, Thank you or the opportunity to revise and resubmit our manuscript "Validity and Reliability of the Interpersonal Competence Questionnaire: Empirical Evidence from an Italian Study" which had been JOBA-D-15-00032. We appreciate the input provided by you and the four reviewers and believe it has substantially enhanced the contribution our manuscript can make to the literature. Below we have copied your decision letter followed by the reviews and to each point made we provide a description of how we addressed the issue or a rationale for why we did not in the rare instance when that was applicable. Our comments to you and the reviewers are designated with "Reply:" at the start of the paragraph.Thank you and best wishes on behalf of all co-authors, (First Author)Dear Dr. XXXX:Thank you for your recent submission of the above referenced manuscript to the Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. The review process on your manuscript is now complete. I was fortunate to receive the input of four reviewers who have expertise in this area of research, and I have reviewed the manuscript in detail.There are a number of strengths in your manuscript. It is well-written and contributes to our knowledge on interpersonal competence, which is of interest to our readership. We also had concerns about your manuscript which are outlined below. As you know, acceptance of a manuscript for publication in the Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment requires a favorable evaluation from all reviewers. Based upon the reviews, I regret that I cannot currently accept the manuscript for publication. I would, however, like to invite you to submit a revision that addresses our concerns. In that revision, please pay special attention to the following:• Address questions about whether the ICQ is measuring a general interpersonal construct rather than specific interpersonal skills.Re...

show abstract

“…However, a smaller number of studies have employed network analysis to study psychopathology at the construct level (i.e., where nodes represent conceptually related symptom/behavior aggregates; Costantini et al, 2015; Costantini & Perugini, 2012; Hoorelbeke, Marchetti, De Schryver, & Koster, 2016; Schlegel, Grandjean, & Scherer, 2013). The construct level and symptom level approaches taken by these investigators demonstrate the flexibility of the network approach in characterizing psychopathology phenomena at various levels of analysis.…”

Section: Using Network Analysis To Visualize Elements Of the Vicious mentioning

confidence: 99%

A network approach to modeling comorbid internalizing and alcohol use disorders.

Anker¹,

Forbes²,

Almquist³

et al. 2017

Journal of Abnormal Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Internalizing disorders co-occur with alcohol use disorder (AUD) at a rate that exceeds chance and compromise conventional AUD treatment. The “vicious cycle” model of comorbidity specifies drinking to cope (DTC) as a link between these disorders that, when not directly addressed, undermines the effectiveness of conventional treatments. Interventions based on this model have proven successful but there is no direct evidence for how and to what extent DTC contributes to the maintenance of comorbidity. In the present study, we used network analysis to depict associations between syndrome-specific groupings of internalizing symptoms, alcohol craving, and drinking behavior, as well as DTC and other extradiagnostic variables specified in the vicious cycle model (e.g., perceived stress and coping self-efficacy). Network analyses of 362 individuals with comorbid anxiety and AUD assessed at the beginning of residential AUD treatment indicated that while internalizing conditions and drinking elements had only weak direct associations, they were strongly connected with DTC and perceived stress. Consistent with this, centrality indices showed that DTC ranked as the most central/important element in the network in terms of its “connectedness” to all other network elements. A series of model simulations—in which individual elements were statistically controlled for—demonstrated that DTC accounted for all the relationships between the drinking-related elements and internalizing elements in the network; no other variable had this effect. Taken together, our findings suggest that DTC may serve as a “keystone” process in maintaining comorbidity between internalizing disorders and AUD.

show abstract

Constructs of social and emotional effectiveness: Different labels, same content?

Cited by 32 publications

References 20 publications

The Incremental Validity of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The Incremental Validity of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Validity and Reliability of the Interpersonal Competence Questionnaire: Empirical Evidence from an Italian Study

A network approach to modeling comorbid internalizing and alcohol use disorders.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About