2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructivism and critical realism as alternative approaches to the study of business networks: Convergences and divergences in theory and in research practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both structuration (see for instance Ellis & Mayer, 2001;Nicholson et al, 2009;Nicholson et al, 2013;Peters et al, 2009) and critical realism (see for instance Easton, 2010;Ehret, 2013;Harrison & Easton, 2002;Matthyssens et al, 2013;Peters et al, 2013a;Ryan et al, 2012) have seen limited, but increasing use in industrial marketing scholarship. It is clear that critical realism is gaining most traction, and our concern is that is that IM scholars choose one to the exclusion of the other when so much's stands to be gained by using both structuration and critical realism (and others), we will argue as part of a pluralism of pluralistic perspectives Critical realism and structuration were conceived by their founders (Bhaskar and Giddens) as stratified rather than flat ontologies with reality seen as recursive and emergent.…”
Section: Agency and Structure In Industrial Marketing Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both structuration (see for instance Ellis & Mayer, 2001;Nicholson et al, 2009;Nicholson et al, 2013;Peters et al, 2009) and critical realism (see for instance Easton, 2010;Ehret, 2013;Harrison & Easton, 2002;Matthyssens et al, 2013;Peters et al, 2013a;Ryan et al, 2012) have seen limited, but increasing use in industrial marketing scholarship. It is clear that critical realism is gaining most traction, and our concern is that is that IM scholars choose one to the exclusion of the other when so much's stands to be gained by using both structuration and critical realism (and others), we will argue as part of a pluralism of pluralistic perspectives Critical realism and structuration were conceived by their founders (Bhaskar and Giddens) as stratified rather than flat ontologies with reality seen as recursive and emergent.…”
Section: Agency and Structure In Industrial Marketing Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research relies on a philosophical standpoint that overlaps between constructivism and critical realism [58,59]. Furthermore, in practice, we apply a qualitative case study for this research where we can collect a rich set of data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the paper begins a new line of enquiry in the industrial marketing literature on the role of industrial workshop venue in buyer-seller behaviour (Hingley, 2005a(Hingley, , 2005b and recognizes the significance of discrete, episodic relational institutional arrangements and mechanisms for maintaining power, structures and institutions (Kumar, 2005;Yang & Wang, 2011). The industrial workshop as a unit of analysis opens up an understanding of institutional work that is commensurate with the interaction approach (Håkansson, 1982) and builds on the view of multiple embedded power structures posited by the traditions of the Industrial Marketing and Purchasing (IMP) Group (Ford, Gadde, Håkansson, Snehota, & Waluszewski, 2003;Meehan & Wright, 2012;Peters, Pressey, Vanharanta, & Johnson, 2013). Second, this study makes an important contribution to Lawrence & Suddaby's (2006) study, and related research in business marketing (Kumar, 2005;Jia, Cai &Xu, 2014;Yang & Wang, 2011) on agentic power by showing how institutional work constituted subjects -the suppliers -transposing and mobilizing them with 'drama' in the sense of fictionalised representation of games, ceremonial awards and new distribution inititatives.…”
Section: Institutional Maintenance Work and Power Preservation In Busmentioning
confidence: 99%