2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1804.05495
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructive Reverse Mathematics

Abstract: However, there are also uses of ACC and ADC of a more structural kind. The proof that LLPO implies WKL needs ACC not because we do not assume that we have a nice representations of binary trees, but because we need to use LLPO countable many times.To gain more insights into phenomena of the second kind, attempts have been made to simply move choice principles into the list of principle studied [17]. And indeed, the original plan for this thesis was to work choice-sensitive and distinguish, for example, between… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Constructively, one can not prove that N N and B N are in bijection. However, KT is equivalent to the existence of a continuous bijection B N → N N with a continuous modulus of continuity [11]. Furthermore, KT yields a continuous bijection…”
Section: Axioms On Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Constructively, one can not prove that N N and B N are in bijection. However, KT is equivalent to the existence of a continuous bijection B N → N N with a continuous modulus of continuity [11]. Furthermore, KT yields a continuous bijection…”
Section: Axioms On Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…definable in a model of computation. CT is well-studied as part of Russian constructivism [32] and in the field of constructive reverse mathematics [24,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar analysis is carried out in publications on constructive reverse mathematics, where one does not assume classical logic, but the axiom of countable or even dependent choice. However, we are only aware of an analysis for the compactness theorem for propositional logic rather than first-order logic, which is equivalent to WKL for decidable trees [12].…”
Section: Compactness and Weak Kőnig's Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that in the context of constructive reverse mathematics (e.g. in [12]) WKL is only stated for decidable trees. We however need both notions and thus distinguish them by an index.…”
Section: Compactness and Weak Kőnig's Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation