2016
DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.12220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructions, reconstructions and deconstructions of ‘family’ amongst people who live apart together (LATs)

Abstract: This article explores how people who live apart from their partners in Britain describe and understand 'family'. It investigates whether, and how far, non-cohabiting partners, friends, 'blood' and legal ties are seen as 'family', and how practices of care and support, and feelings of closeness are related to these constructions. It suggests that people in LAT relationships creatively draw and re-draw the boundaries of family belonging in ways that involve emotionally subjective understandings of family life, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study drew upon social constructionist approaches which view “family” meanings as both individual and social creations: the outcome of individual reflections as well as social processes and interactions (McCarthy, 2012). Processes of construction, reconstruction, and deconstruction of familial belonging lie at the center of recent theorizations of intimate life (Stoilova, Roseneil, Carter, Duncan, & Phillips, 2017, p. 78).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study drew upon social constructionist approaches which view “family” meanings as both individual and social creations: the outcome of individual reflections as well as social processes and interactions (McCarthy, 2012). Processes of construction, reconstruction, and deconstruction of familial belonging lie at the center of recent theorizations of intimate life (Stoilova, Roseneil, Carter, Duncan, & Phillips, 2017, p. 78).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could also be woven into the general trend of increasing mobilities for some individuals linked to longer (physical and/or temporal) commuting practices (Rae, 2017). Other changing societal factors here may also include the formation of couples living apart together (LATs), whereby one partner moves (on a weekly basis) to live away from the family home for work reasons (Duncan, 2015; Stoilova et al, 2017), to reside at a temporary residence or second home near to their place of work.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contemporary family life course scholarship also draws on structural transitions, but with an assumption of diversity of family forms. Scholars have shown increased variation in family transitions resulting from policy changes such as the liberalization of laws regulating marriage and divorce (Jowett 2017 ) and changes in social mores such as those related to cohabitation (Stoilova et al 2017 ) and fertility (Engin et al 2020 ). For the most part, each transition has been studied separately, providing data on the likelihood of being childless (Kreyenfeld and Konietzka 2017 ), ever-married (Keenan et al 2017 ), divorced (Couch et al 2020 ) or widowed (Schmitz 2021 ) during their lives.…”
Section: Framing the Research Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%