2021
DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2021.3060797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of Time Invariant Spatially Coupled LDPC Codes Free of Small Trapping Sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the effect of the coupling width w on scaling parameters and resulting finite-length performances is still an open problem. It has been pointed out that the coupling width w is related to the girth property [17], [18], trapping sets [21], and convergence speed [22]. They share an intuitive conclusion that large w has a positive impact on the finitelength performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the effect of the coupling width w on scaling parameters and resulting finite-length performances is still an open problem. It has been pointed out that the coupling width w is related to the girth property [17], [18], trapping sets [21], and convergence speed [22]. They share an intuitive conclusion that large w has a positive impact on the finitelength performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In this paper, we consider (l, r, w, L, M ) finite-length SC-LDPC codes, where w is the coupling width that determines the number of consecutive positions to be coupled and M is the number of variable nodes at each position [4]. Based on comprehensive asymptotic analysis, researches on the code design of (l, r, w, L, M ) SC-LDPC codes having superior finite-length performance have been followed [13]- [21]. It is desirable to construct practically good codes showing superior finite-length performances for a given code rate and code length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The error floor is attributed to certain harmful graphical structures within the code's Tanner graph, referred to as trapping sets (TSs). The error floor of LDPC codes has been widely studied from different perspectives including code constructions with low error floor [1]- [15], decoder design for improved error floor performance [16]- [24], enumeration of TS structures [25]- [30], and error floor estimation [31]- [45]. July 27, 2021 DRAFT arXiv:2107.11479v1 [cs.IT] 23 Jul 2021…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that the performance of an SC code improves as its memory increases. This is a byproduct of improved node expansion and additional degrees of freedom that can be utilized to decrease the number of short cycles and detrimental objects [9], [10], [12]- [14]. A plethora of existing works [9], [10], [15], [16] focus on minimizing the number of short cycles in the graph of the SC code.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method is hard to execute in practice for high-memory codes due to the increasing computational complexity. Heuristic methods that search for good SC codes with high memories are derived in [14]- [17]. However, high-memory codes designed by purely heuristic methods are unable to reach the potential performance gain that can be achieved through high memories due to lack of theoretical properties; several of these codes can even be beat by optimally designed QC-SC codes with lower memories under the same constraint length [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%