2014
DOI: 10.1142/s0219498814500133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of systems of polynomial equations with exact p-Divisibility via the covering method

Abstract: We present an elementary method to compute the exact p-divisibility of exponential sums of systems of polynomial equations over the prime field. Our results extend results by Carlitz and provide concrete and simple conditions to construct families of polynomial equations that are solvable over the prime field.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The covering method to study the -divisibility of exponential sums is an elementary method introduced in [6] that lets us determine sufficient conditions to guarantee solvability and allows us to construct general families of solvable systems of polynomial equations [4,5]. Applications to cryptography and coding theory.…”
Section: For Permission To Reprint This Article Please Contactmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The covering method to study the -divisibility of exponential sums is an elementary method introduced in [6] that lets us determine sufficient conditions to guarantee solvability and allows us to construct general families of solvable systems of polynomial equations [4,5]. Applications to cryptography and coding theory.…”
Section: For Permission To Reprint This Article Please Contactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for 1 , … , ≥ 1, and such that 1 + ⋯ + is as small as possible [4]. If = 2, then = { 1 1 , 2 2 , … , } is a covering for , as some of the could be zero.…”
Section: -Divisibility Of Exponential Sumsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, n = 2 a (20 + 32j 2 ) and k = 2 a (8 + 16j 2 ). It appears that as long as a > 1, then as j 2 runs through the non-negative integers, the sequence ν 2 (S(σ n,k )) is given by 5,6,6,7,6,7,7,8,6,7,7,8,7,8,8,9,6,7,7,8, · · · This appears to be the sequence w 2 (4j 2 + 3) + 3. The class 4j 2 + 1 does not have this behavior.…”
Section: The Case K = 2 a (M − 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As before, consider the class 16j 4 +9. If a > 2, then the sequence ν 2 (S(σ n,k )) is given by 6,7,7,8,7,8,8,9,7,8,8,9,8,9,9,10,7,8,8,9, · · · This sequence seems to be w 2 (16j 4 + 9) + 4. Observe that now we need a > 2.…”
Section: The Case K = 2 a (M − 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%