1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf02573285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of right topological compactifications for discrete versions of subsemigroups of compact groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PYM [49] showed that they were the maximal ideal spaces of the C*-algebra of bounded functions f on G which have the property that osc (/, x) (the oscillation of / at x) exceeds any ε > 0 at only a finite number of points. The simple construction in Example 4.7 is due to HELMER and ISIK [19]. They also point out a curious fact: the construction is only of interest for metrizable G, since if G is not metrizable the only compactification of G \ {1} is G itself.…”
Section: Theorem 44 Let S Be a Locally Compact Right Topological Sementioning
confidence: 96%
“…PYM [49] showed that they were the maximal ideal spaces of the C*-algebra of bounded functions f on G which have the property that osc (/, x) (the oscillation of / at x) exceeds any ε > 0 at only a finite number of points. The simple construction in Example 4.7 is due to HELMER and ISIK [19]. They also point out a curious fact: the construction is only of interest for metrizable G, since if G is not metrizable the only compactification of G \ {1} is G itself.…”
Section: Theorem 44 Let S Be a Locally Compact Right Topological Sementioning
confidence: 96%
“…A and B be as in (2)(3). For each infinite subset U <=A let U, U V U 2 ,U 3 ,... and U', U{, U' 2 , U' 3 ,... be the partition of N. Then in order to distinguish the results of choosing different subsets U, we shall call S v the semigroup produced by the procedure of Section 2, and {pu\, {q v } its minimal left ideals.…”
Section: Definition 3 1 (I) Letmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pym [10] gave a generalization of this construction with 2 C idempotents, but this was not so transparent. Recently, Helmer and I §ik [3] have simplified the construction in [11] by producing a straightforward construction of a compact right topological semigroup S in which the topological centre A(S) = {seS: t->s + t is continuous on S} is dense, S = A(S) \JL where L is a left ideal, L has 2 C idempotents and every maximal group in L is dense.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compactifications by filters of zero sets 365 (ii) From [4], theorem 4 and [5], we have fi(G\{x}) = G so that any continuous function on G\{x} has a continuous extension to G. Let A =/~1({0}) for some continuous function f:G\{x}->M, and l e t / be the continuous extension of/ to G.…”
Section: Maximal Prime Z-filters and Z-ultrafiltersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The semigroup structure of the space of prime z filters In this section we define a semigroup operation © on the set of prime z-filters of a compact metrizable weakly cancellative semitopological semigroup S in such a way that # becomes a compact right topological semigroup (that is a semigroup in which addition is continuous in the left hand variable) and we investigate algebraic and topological properties of # and the relations between &P and S. We finally show that when S is a compact group then # is algebraically and topologically isomorphic with the group constructed by Helmer and Isik in [4]. Although we use + for the semigroup multiplication, it need not be commutative.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%