2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2003.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of response surfaces based on progressive-lattice-sampling experimental designs with application to uncertainty propagation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Literature [4] showed that the accuracy of Kriging model approach is not higher than that of RSM if  is inappropriate. In DACE [13], *  is found by the pattern search method, but the result is greatly affected by the given initial value  because pattern search method has to start with the initial  , which can be seen in Section 2.2.2.2.…”
Section: Pso-optimized Krigingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Literature [4] showed that the accuracy of Kriging model approach is not higher than that of RSM if  is inappropriate. In DACE [13], *  is found by the pattern search method, but the result is greatly affected by the given initial value  because pattern search method has to start with the initial  , which can be seen in Section 2.2.2.2.…”
Section: Pso-optimized Krigingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Romero [4], the first researcher applied Kriging on structural reliability problems, compared Kriging with polynomial regression and finite-element interpolation by the Latin hypercube sampling method. Kaymaz [5] calculate structural reliability based on Bucher's design and central composite design, and compared Kriging model method with classic response surface method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several types of metamodel, including the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Kriging are cited. The application of the kriging technique for assessing the reliability of structures is very recent [8,22]. Several studies [3,14,10,21,23] have shown growing interest in this type of metamodel for assessing the probability of failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of Finite Element (FE) modeling, the Stochastic Finite Element Modeling (SFEM) based on perturbation, spectral Neumann expansion, projection on a polynomial chaos or direct Monte-Carlo simulation methods are the most popular approaches widely developed these last few years [1][2][3][4][5]. Methods based on non-determinist arithmetic operations (fuzzy [6][7], interval [8]) or on response surface [9][10][11][12] are also interesting alternatives to SFEM. For a detailed review, the reader could refer to [13] which present a very interesting state-of-the-art on computational stochastic mechanics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%