2018
DOI: 10.1108/el-03-2017-0071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of personal knowledge maps for a peer-to-peer information-sharing environment

Abstract: Purpose Browsing knowledge documents in a peer-to-peer (P2P) environment is difficult because knowledge documents in such an environment are large in quantity and distributed over different peers who organize the documents according to their own views. This paper aims to propose a method for constructing a personal knowledge map for a peer to facilitate knowledge browsing and alleviate information overload in P2P environments. Design/methodology/approach The research presents a method for constructing a pers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(87 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PCS dimension gave a low forecast with R 2 at 0.349 which implied the employees’ perception of support from co-workers regarding help, encouragement, suggestions, knowledge sharing for learning and development through four questions developed by researchers. The empirical result was consistent with the theory and concept of Beales and Wilson (2015), Blanchard and Thacker (2012), Chiaburu and Harrison (2008), Elias and Upton-Davis (2015), Jenkins et al (2018), Na-nan et al (2017), Qin et al (2018), Thomas and Salzer (2017) and Thompson and Bolino (2018). Furthermore, the four questions were confirmed by statistical analysis and concurred with empirical data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The PCS dimension gave a low forecast with R 2 at 0.349 which implied the employees’ perception of support from co-workers regarding help, encouragement, suggestions, knowledge sharing for learning and development through four questions developed by researchers. The empirical result was consistent with the theory and concept of Beales and Wilson (2015), Blanchard and Thacker (2012), Chiaburu and Harrison (2008), Elias and Upton-Davis (2015), Jenkins et al (2018), Na-nan et al (2017), Qin et al (2018), Thomas and Salzer (2017) and Thompson and Bolino (2018). Furthermore, the four questions were confirmed by statistical analysis and concurred with empirical data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Previous research found that perceived workplace support (PWS) significantly influenced staff retention, competency, development and organisational commitment (Baran et al, 2012;Eisenberger et al, 2002;Masterson et al, 2000). Supporting factors in a workplace can be divided into perceived organisational support (POS) (Akgunduz et al, 2018;Gigliotti et al, 2018;Islam and Ahmed, 2018;Lee and Jeung, 2018;Naotunna and Arachchige, 2016), perceived supervisor support (PSS) (Gok et al, 2015;Straub et al, 2018;Zeffane et al, 2018), perceived co-worker support (PCS) (Jenkins et al, 2018;Qin et al, 2018;Thomas and Salzer, 2017) and perceived sufficient resource support (PSRS) (Küçükaslan Ekmekçi and Tekin, 2011;Nielsen et al, 2010;Obadara and Alaka, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the study on knowledge mapping that we found through literature came from China country such as studies of research trends on virtual communities in publications in China , maps of personal knowledge in peer to peer environments from the CNKI database (Qin et al, 2018), search for medical image records that were using semantic metadata and ontology-based knowledge mapping are also built to capture and manage manufacturing company knowledge appropriately . China as a developed country while Indonesia as a developing country certainly has a different culture, therefore this study wants to see insight into the country of Indonesia as a developing country related to the implementation of knowledge mapping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%