2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2007.04.250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of modified embedded atom method potentials for Cu, Pt and Cu–Pt and modelling surface segregation in Cu3Pt alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike previous studies [6], the bcc and sc (simple cubic) structures are not included in the present parameterization. In the bcc and sc phases, the contribution of the second nearest neighbor atoms to the background electronic densities may become significant [11].…”
Section: Scaling Factor Weighting Factors and Exponential Decay Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unlike previous studies [6], the bcc and sc (simple cubic) structures are not included in the present parameterization. In the bcc and sc phases, the contribution of the second nearest neighbor atoms to the background electronic densities may become significant [11].…”
Section: Scaling Factor Weighting Factors and Exponential Decay Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most DFT calculations for surface energies, E bulk in eq. (12a) is usually taken as the cohesive energy of the element in question calculated with a periodic supercell system, e.g., in recent DFT-based MEAM parameterization studies reported in the literature [5,6]. However, it has been found that the surface energy calculated with eq.…”
Section: The Surface Energy Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with the first-principles potentials, which usually require huge computational cost and limited atom numbers, empirical potentials can fast handle large sized materials. In fact, there are various techniques for developing many-body types of potential, such as the Finnis-Sinclair (FS) model [37], the Tight-Binding (TB) approach [38], and the Embedding-Atom method (EAM) [39,40]. Of these models, the EAM potential is a popular framework of empirical potentials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semi-empirical calculations construct a potential combining parameters fit to data and parameters calculated self-consistently using ab initio calculated data [66][67][68][69][70]. The power in semi-empirical calculations is once the fitting parameters reproduce the empirical result, thus constructing a good potential, the model can be coupled to molecular dynamic or monte carlo methods, which enable the same potentials and parameters to be used in predicting the properties at different pressure and temperature, without performing any additional fitting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%