2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2013.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of microscale structures in enclosed microfluidic networks by using a magnetic beads based method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gold nanostructures were fabricated at defined positions within microchannels by electrochemical deposition, and used as electrocatalytic materials for glucose detection and suitable sensing surfaces for ultratrace arsenic (III) detection. Wang et al presented a magnetic-beads-based approach and built microstructures in enclosed microfluidic networks [41].…”
Section: Modification On Microchannelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gold nanostructures were fabricated at defined positions within microchannels by electrochemical deposition, and used as electrocatalytic materials for glucose detection and suitable sensing surfaces for ultratrace arsenic (III) detection. Wang et al presented a magnetic-beads-based approach and built microstructures in enclosed microfluidic networks [41].…”
Section: Modification On Microchannelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it requires external energy such as electric fields and magnetic fields. Typical contactless trapping approaches include dielectrophoresis trapping [34,35], gel trapping [36], magnetic trapping [37,38], acoustic trapping [39,40] and laser trapping [41,42]. Specific cell trapping in microfluidic systems could be especially significant for separation methods which can cover many biological use, even larger that the item they selected such as bacteria cells and blood cells [43][44][45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many instances, they can be prepared from inexpensive materials, such as silicon, glass, polymethyl methacrylate, and polydimethylsiloxane, and mass-produced at a low cost; in fact, at a significantly lower cost than LOV platforms. However, microfluidic devices are usually dedicated; that is, they have a fixed architecture for predetermined chemistries and sample extraction protocols unless moving components (e.g., magnetic beads) are integrated into the microfluidic network [47]. The most severe limitation of microfluidic devices for real-life applications is the difficulty of handling complex matrices due to the ease of channel clogging or cross-contamination [48].…”
Section: Introduction: Perspective On Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%