2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11276-015-0964-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of indoor floor plan and localization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a biometric key derived from machine learning models, it is possible to maintain a communication link between senders and receivers (Hamadaqa et al 2019;Mulhem et al 2019;Mars et al 2019). Moreover, the use of machine learning can be applied to indoor localization and distance estimation (Alabadleh et al 2018;Aljaafreh et al 2017;Abadleh et al 2016Abadleh et al , 2017.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a biometric key derived from machine learning models, it is possible to maintain a communication link between senders and receivers (Hamadaqa et al 2019;Mulhem et al 2019;Mars et al 2019). Moreover, the use of machine learning can be applied to indoor localization and distance estimation (Alabadleh et al 2018;Aljaafreh et al 2017;Abadleh et al 2016Abadleh et al , 2017.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the path-loss models have been already studied for indoor environments (Seidel and Rappaport, 1992;So and Lin, 2011;Alikhani et al, 2017;Atia et al, 2012;Zhang et al, 2017), where the power of the transmitters and attenuation of walls and floors have to be known for predicting the pathloss model. However, RSS changes due to the environmental effects leads to inaccurate distance estimations (Torres-Solis et al, 2010;Abadleh et al, 2016). Therefore, authors in Li et al (2018) presented a method that fits the distance between APs and RPs calculated by path-loss formula to the actual distances between them to better estimate the distances based on RSS values.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biometrics [14]- [22], gene profiling [23], credit card fraud detection [24], [25], face image retrieval [24], contentbased image retrieval [26], [27], disease detection [28]- [32], internet of things [33]- [43], Natural Language Processing [44], [45], network security [46]- [52], image recognition [53]- [58], Anomaly Detection [59]- [69], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%