2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.07.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of explicit and implicit dynamic finite difference schemes and application to the large-eddy simulation of the Taylor–Green vortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(139 reference statements)
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equations are solved in Fourier space by a pseudo-spectral method [25] with anisotropic 2/3-de-aliasing for the nonlinear convective terms. Further, a pressurecorrection algorithm is applied in combination with an explicit low-storage six-stage lowdissipation Runge-Kutta method [32].…”
Section: Direct Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The equations are solved in Fourier space by a pseudo-spectral method [25] with anisotropic 2/3-de-aliasing for the nonlinear convective terms. Further, a pressurecorrection algorithm is applied in combination with an explicit low-storage six-stage lowdissipation Runge-Kutta method [32].…”
Section: Direct Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coherent structure itself, finally breaks down around t = 8. Therefore, it is expected that for t ≥ 9, the flow is fully turbulent and nearly-isotropic [25].…”
Section: Direct Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The TGV is a well-established computational benchmark to investigate the dissipative and dispersive properties of various numerical schemes, and one can find more details about this research area in conjunction with numerical investigations in [29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Numerical Model and Flow Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%