2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.571957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of Cognitive Maps to Improve Reading Performance by Text Signaling: Reading Text on Paper Compared to on Screen

Abstract: Reading text from a screen has been shown to be less effective compared with reading text from paper. Various signals may provide both background information and navigational cues, and may promote the construction of cognitive maps during on-screen reading, thus improving reading performance. This study randomly divided 75 college students into a paper reading group and an on-screen reading group. Both groups were tested for navigation and reading comprehension in response to three different forms of signaling… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The medium materiality mechanism considers the impact the medium has on an individual, with research showing that reading from physical paper better supports the development of cognitive maps (Mangen et al, 2019). Lastly, text signalling impacts on how well cognitive maps were constructed (Shi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Medium Materiality Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The medium materiality mechanism considers the impact the medium has on an individual, with research showing that reading from physical paper better supports the development of cognitive maps (Mangen et al, 2019). Lastly, text signalling impacts on how well cognitive maps were constructed (Shi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Medium Materiality Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the use of text signalling supported the development and strength of cognitive maps. (Shi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations