2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16413-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of a web-based nanomaterial database by big data curation and modeling friendly nanostructure annotations

Abstract: Modern nanotechnology research has generated numerous experimental data for various nanomaterials. However, the few nanomaterial databases available are not suitable for modeling studies due to the way they are curated. Here, we report the construction of a large nanomaterial database containing annotated nanostructures suited for modeling research. The database, which is publicly available through http://www.pubvinas.com/, contains 705 unique nanomaterials covering 11 material types. Each nanomaterial has up … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In vitro NP-cell interactions [22] Mixed naive Bayes, sequential minimal optimization (SMO), J48, bagging, locally weighted learning (LWL), decision Q-dots and FeOx NPs Cellular uptake of cross-linked iron oxide NPs [25] Target specificity of NPs Nanoinformatics prediction [18,26] Logistic linear regression with an expectation minimization algorithm NPs in the printing industry Pulmonary toxicity [27] Apriori algorithm Nanoparticulate aerosol Systems toxicology meta-analysis [28] Conductive metal NPs SEM analytic tool [29] Decision tree Poly amido amine dendrimers Cytotoxicity, prediction as cell viability considered as a binary variable, toxic/nontoxic NPs in human colorectal cancer cells [23] 21 different NPs Classify nanomaterials [30] Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) Ecotoxicity of ENMs [31] k-nearest neighbors Q-dots and FeOx NPs Cellular uptake of cross-linked iron oxide NPs [25,32] 3. Theoretical and Computational Ab Initio Tools to Address Safer Bio-Nano Materials…”
Section: Standard Information Reporting In Nanomedicine and Nanotoxicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro NP-cell interactions [22] Mixed naive Bayes, sequential minimal optimization (SMO), J48, bagging, locally weighted learning (LWL), decision Q-dots and FeOx NPs Cellular uptake of cross-linked iron oxide NPs [25] Target specificity of NPs Nanoinformatics prediction [18,26] Logistic linear regression with an expectation minimization algorithm NPs in the printing industry Pulmonary toxicity [27] Apriori algorithm Nanoparticulate aerosol Systems toxicology meta-analysis [28] Conductive metal NPs SEM analytic tool [29] Decision tree Poly amido amine dendrimers Cytotoxicity, prediction as cell viability considered as a binary variable, toxic/nontoxic NPs in human colorectal cancer cells [23] 21 different NPs Classify nanomaterials [30] Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) Ecotoxicity of ENMs [31] k-nearest neighbors Q-dots and FeOx NPs Cellular uptake of cross-linked iron oxide NPs [25,32] 3. Theoretical and Computational Ab Initio Tools to Address Safer Bio-Nano Materials…”
Section: Standard Information Reporting In Nanomedicine and Nanotoxicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well established that simulations can be highly useful in developing novel and smart nanomedicine systems. In this regard, many efforts have been devoted to exploiting Molecular Dynamics (MD) (31)(32)(33)(34)(35), Density Functional Theory(DFT) (36), and Machine Learning (37)(38)(39) in discovering emerging and smart drug nanocarriers. Shariatinia and Mazloom-Jalali (40) perused the graphene containing chitosan as a carrier of anticancer ifosfamide drug through MD, in which, the N-doped graphene/chitosan was suggested as an effective drug carrier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means several assumptions on metadata similarity or expansion of the dataset with relevant metadata is needed to identify statistical similarity or significant difference [ 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 ]. As a result, the currently existing databases do not meet the needs of the modelling community, which has led to the emergence of computational databases, allowing capture of computational descriptors and direct application of modelling tools [ 157 ]. For example, the NanoSolveIT project is developing a modelling-dedicated database through the Enalos cloud platform.…”
Section: Discussion On Metadata Challenges and Recommendations Formentioning
confidence: 99%