1995
DOI: 10.2320/jinstmet1952.59.6_679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of a Positron Lifetime Spectrometer with &beta;<SUP>+</SUP>-&gamma; Coincidence and Positron Energy Selection for <I>In-situ</I> Studies of Lattice Defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 can be obtained from the result of the two-component analysis shown in Fig. 3 and equation (6). From Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 can be obtained from the result of the two-component analysis shown in Fig. 3 and equation (6). From Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both methods have disadvantages such as the large size of the experimental ap-paratus (monoenergetic positron beam method) or difficulty in sample preparation (internal positron source method). Shirai and co-workers proposed a third method in which fast positrons emitted from a 68 Ge sealed positron source are directly irradiated into a sample at high temperatures with magnetic lenses to eliminate low-energy positrons which cause a degradation of the time resolution in positron lifetime measurements [6][7][8][9]. This third method allows us to separate the positron source from the heated sample like in the monoenergetic positron beam method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to detecting 𝛾 photons with an energy of 1.275 MeV, the efficiency of directly detecting charged positrons is higher, resulting in the 𝛽 + -𝛾 coincidence PAL spectrometer having the potential advantage of an ultra-high CCR [17][18][19]. Early 𝛽 + -𝛾 coincidence PAL spectrometers suffer from two major problems: high 𝑃 SC and poor CTR (303-368 ps [18,20,21]). Moving the sample away from the plastic scintillator and obtaining the stop signal of the PAL by coincidence measurement of the two annihilation 𝛾 photons can effectively reduce 𝑃 SC [18,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving the sample away from the plastic scintillator and obtaining the stop signal of the PAL by coincidence measurement of the two annihilation 𝛾 photons can effectively reduce 𝑃 SC [18,22]. On this basis, controlling the energy of positrons [20,21,23] or using an avalanche diode as the start signal detector [24,25] can improve the CTR to some extent, and the current best CTR is 240 ps [24]. However, these approaches often result in significant loss of the ultra-high CCR advantage (for example, 20 cps [23]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of a thin scintillator Shirai et al [25,26] propose to use a silicon avalanche diode. The signal produced when the positron penetrates the diode has the rise time of about 1.5 ns, i.e similar to that from the fast scintillator, thus diode detector does not deteriorate the resolution of the spectrometer.…”
Section: Generation Of the Start Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%