2017
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b03538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of a Polyhedral DNA 12-Arm Junction for Self-Assembly of Wireframe DNA Lattices

Abstract: A variety of different tiles for the construction of DNA lattices have been developed since the structural DNA nanotechnology field was born. The majority of these are designed for the realization of close-packed structures, where DNA helices are arranged in parallel and tiles are connected through sticky ends. Assembly of such structures requires the use of cation-rich buffers to minimize repulsion between parallel helices, which poses limits to the application of DNA nanostructures. Wireframe structures, on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 DNA nanotechnology can be mainly divided into two categories: structural DNA nanotechnology and dynamic DNA nanotechnology, in which DNA strands are employed to program the spatial and temporal distribution of matter. 3 Based on 'bottom-up' engineering approaches, structural DNA nanotechnology has realized the fabrication of 2D and 3D DNA assemblies with various sizes and spatial structures, such as DNA lattices, 4,5 DNA origami, 6 DNA tetrahedron structures, [7][8][9] DNA nanotubes 10,11 and so on. Unlike structural DNA nanotechnology, dynamic DNA nanotechnology lays emphasis on the non-equilibrium dynamics, in which the formation of DNA nanostructures results from successive dynamic assembly of DNA motifs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 DNA nanotechnology can be mainly divided into two categories: structural DNA nanotechnology and dynamic DNA nanotechnology, in which DNA strands are employed to program the spatial and temporal distribution of matter. 3 Based on 'bottom-up' engineering approaches, structural DNA nanotechnology has realized the fabrication of 2D and 3D DNA assemblies with various sizes and spatial structures, such as DNA lattices, 4,5 DNA origami, 6 DNA tetrahedron structures, [7][8][9] DNA nanotubes 10,11 and so on. Unlike structural DNA nanotechnology, dynamic DNA nanotechnology lays emphasis on the non-equilibrium dynamics, in which the formation of DNA nanostructures results from successive dynamic assembly of DNA motifs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,28 Approaches based on DNA "origami' and single-stranded (ss) DNA "bricks", can produce 3D architectures of arbitrary shape, which are however very compact, limiting diffusion of solutes and leaving little space to incorporate active elements or molecular cargo. [17][18][19]29,30 An exception is represented by open origami frameworks 18 and by the recently introduced origami-based tenesegrity triangles that form a scaled-up version of the analogous nanoscale lattices, 20,28 enabling the incorporation of nanoparticles. 31 In all cases, the complexity of origami requires cumbersome sample preparation protocols leading to low yields and high costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional studies with solution scattering data from the flux-optimized HyperSAXS laboratory instrument have been published, highlighting the capabilities of the instrument (van 't Hag et al, 2016;Manuguerra et al, 2017;Maric et al, 2017;Steiner et al, 2018;Gounani et al, 2019;Poghosyan et al, 2019;Najarzadeh et al, 2019;Pedersen et al, 2019;Nagaraj et al, 2020;Fehé r et al, 2020).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%