Conformational flexibility is emerging as a central theme in enzyme catalysis. Thus, identifying and characterizing enzyme dynamics is critical for understanding catalytic mechanisms. Herein, coupling analysis, which uses thermodynamic analysis to assess cooperativity/coupling between distal regions on an enzyme, is used to interrogate substrate specificity among fructose-1,6-(bis)phosphate aldolase (aldolase) isozymes. Aldolase exists as three isozymes, A, B, and C distinguishable by their unique substrate preferences despite the fact that the structures of the active sites of the three isozymes are nearly identical. While conformational flexibility has been observed in aldolase A, its function in the catalytic reaction of aldolase has not been demonstrated. To explore the role of conformational dynamics in substrate specificity, those residues associated with isozyme specificity (ISRs) were swapped and the resulting chimeras were subjected to steady-state kinetics. Thermodynamic analyses suggest cooperativity between a terminal surface patch (TSP) and a distal surface patch (DSP) of ISRs that are separated by >8.9Å. Notably, the coupling energy (ΔG I ) is anti-correlated with respect to the two substrates, fructose 1,6-bisphosphate and fructose 1-phosphate. The difference in coupling energy with respect to these two substrates accounts for about 70% of the energy difference for the ratio of k cat /K m for the two substrates between aldolase A and aldolase B. These non-additive mutational effects between the TSP and DSP provide functional evidence that coupling interactions arising from conformational flexibility during catalysis are a major determinant of substrate specificity.Recent evidence shows dynamic fluctuations of structure are essential components of enzyme catalysis (1). While it is likely that most enzymes exhibit flexibility as part of the catalytic process, the role of this movement is enzyme specific. For example, in the case of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), backbone and side-chain motions are essential for cofactor binding, † This work was supported by Grants GM60616 (to D.R.T. and K.N.A.), DK065089 (to D.R.T), and Training Grant HL07291 (to J.A.P.) from the National Institutes of Health.*To whom correspondence may be addressed: Dean R. Tolan, Biology Department, 5 Cummington St., Boston MA 02215; (617) 353-5310 (tel), (617) 358-0338 (fax), email: tolan@bu.edu., Karen N. Allen, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, 715 Albany St., Boston University School of Medicine, Boston MA 02118; (617) 638-4398 (tel), (617) 638-4273 (fax), allen@med-xtal.bu.edu. ⊥ Present address: Department of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Biochemistry, Brown University, 185 Meeting Street, Box G-L2, Providence RI 02912 1 ISR, isozyme-specific residue; Fru 1,6-P 2 , fructose 1,6-bisphosphate; Fru 1-P, fructose 1-phosphate; CTR, C-terminal region; TSP, terminal surface patch; DSP, distal surface patch; DTNB, 5,5′dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid). Recently, the importance of conformational flexibility has ...