2021
DOI: 10.7150/jca.50413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction of a Glycolysis-related long noncoding RNA signature for predicting survival in endometrial cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have established a prognostic model for UCEC, but they have not specifically targeted grade III high-risk patients with a poor prognosis. 18 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 47 , 48 , 49 Among the four prognostic risk models selected for comparison, our model had the highest C-index, indicating that its overall performance was superior. Taken together, our model was a better predictor of patients’ outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies have established a prognostic model for UCEC, but they have not specifically targeted grade III high-risk patients with a poor prognosis. 18 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 47 , 48 , 49 Among the four prognostic risk models selected for comparison, our model had the highest C-index, indicating that its overall performance was superior. Taken together, our model was a better predictor of patients’ outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In this genomic era, a large number of genome-sequencing technologies and data have emerged, 16 and researchers began to focus on the prognosis prediction of UCEC using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-UCEC cohort. 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 Wang et al. 17 constructed an autophagy-related long-noncoding RNA signature to predict the prognosis of UCEC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compared the prediction performance of the novel immune-related pseudogene signature with four recently published signatures: nine-lncRNA signature (LINC02387, FUT8-AS1, UBXN10-AS1, LINC00473, AL353194.1, FAM222A-AS1, AP002761.3, AL731566.2, and AP001021.2) derived from Xu’s research [ 9 ], nine-mRNA signature (CYP4F3, LYPLA2, CEL, PHGDH, GPAT3, HNMT, UCK2, CKM, and ACACB) derived from Jiang’s study [ 32 ], nine-mRNA signature (TP53, RAE1, RFC2, TAF10, DDB2, UMPS, TAF12, ERCC2, SEC61A1) derived from Liu’s research [ 33 ], and five-lncRNA signature (AL121906.2, BOLA3-AS1, LINC01833, AC016405.3, and RAB11B-AS1) from Jiang’s study [ 34 ] using the same TCGA EC patient cohort. As illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the key role of lncRNAs in regulating energy metabolism in cancer, their function in anaerobic glycolysis in cancer cells has been the focus of many studies [ 32 , 54 ]. A prognostic risk model based on glycolysis-related lncRNAs has been established in endometrial cancer [ 55 ]. However, the effect of glycolysis-related lncRNAs on the prognosis of ccRCC remains unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%