1993
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(1993)119:4(698)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction Cost Factors in Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fluctuation of prices of material: Fluctuation of prices of materials was ranked as 1st place (MI = 0.83) as agreed unanimously by all the respondents and this finding is concurrence with the findugs from other countries (Ameh et al, 2010;Azhar et al, 2008;Chimwaso, 2000;Elinwa and Buba, 1993;Enshassi et al, 2009;Le-Hoai et al, 2008). This factor can be attributed from various reasons such as monopoly of suppliers or unavailability of construction materials locally.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Fluctuation of prices of material: Fluctuation of prices of materials was ranked as 1st place (MI = 0.83) as agreed unanimously by all the respondents and this finding is concurrence with the findugs from other countries (Ameh et al, 2010;Azhar et al, 2008;Chimwaso, 2000;Elinwa and Buba, 1993;Enshassi et al, 2009;Le-Hoai et al, 2008). This factor can be attributed from various reasons such as monopoly of suppliers or unavailability of construction materials locally.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…This is probably due to the negative effects of actions not taken for non-compliance with terms and condition of contract, certifying goods without inspections or tests, falsification of contract documents and receipts to get undue advantage or payments: these were major factors affecting technical performance of local government projects in a negative way. This finding confirmed the findings from the study of Matthew, Patrick and Denise (2013) and Elinwa and Buba (1993) that actions not taken for non-compliance with the terms and conditions of contract and kickbacks were the main factors affecting technical performance of projects. While the study of Stevens and Fuentes-George (2015) had a different view probably it was done in developed country US.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In Nigeria, fraudulent practice affects technical performance of construction projects in various ways which includes: deliberates substitution of specified construction material with less quality ones, improper social contact between contractors and consultants and problems of kickbacks (Inuwa, Usman and Dantong, 2015). Elinwa and Buba (1993) stated that fraudulent practices and kickbacks were the most important factors leading to poor technical performance of projects in the Nigerian construction industry. Stevens and Fuentes-George (2015) mentioned that all government-funded projects in developing countries were political in nature.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Technical Performance Of Sslgpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Okpala and Aniekwu (1988) searched for the main causes of high costs of construction projects in Nigeria, and found that the main causes of cost overruns were shortage of materials, finance and payment for completed works, poor contract management, price fluctuations and fraudulent practices. In another study from Nigeria, conducted by Elinwa and Buba (1993), they found that the material cost, fraudulent practices, materials prices increment, high cost of machineries and poor planning were the most important causes of cost overruns. Koushki, et al (2004) carried out a study about delays and cost increases in the construction of private residential projects in Kuwait, it aimed to find the reasons for delays and cost increases in the construction projects from the standpoint of the owner.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%