2021
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.702102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction and Validation of an Immune-Based Prognostic Model for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Based on Public Databases

Abstract: BackgroundPancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) is a highly lethal and aggressive tumor with poor prognoses. The predictive capability of immune-related genes (IRGs) in PAAD has yet to be explored. We aimed to explore prognostic-related immune genes and develop a prediction model for indicating prognosis in PAAD.MethodsThe messenger (m)RNA expression profiles acquired from public databases were comprehensively integrated and differentially expressed genes were identified. Univariate analysis was utilized to identif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In each cohort, patients were divided into the high- or low-risk group according to the median value of the risk score. To compare the survival difference between high- and low-risk groups, Kaplan–Meier survival and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were conducted by using the R package “survival” and “timeROC.” We also calculated the time-varying concordance index (C-index) of our signature and compared it with six previous published signatures which were based on glycolysis ( Song et al, 2021 ), ferroptosis ( Feng et al, 2021a ), hypoxia ( Ding et al, 2021 ), m6A ( Meng et al, 2020 ), autophagy ( Yu J. et al, 2021 ), and immune ( Mao et al, 2021 ) related genes. The information of these six signatures are listed in Supplementary Table S2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each cohort, patients were divided into the high- or low-risk group according to the median value of the risk score. To compare the survival difference between high- and low-risk groups, Kaplan–Meier survival and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were conducted by using the R package “survival” and “timeROC.” We also calculated the time-varying concordance index (C-index) of our signature and compared it with six previous published signatures which were based on glycolysis ( Song et al, 2021 ), ferroptosis ( Feng et al, 2021a ), hypoxia ( Ding et al, 2021 ), m6A ( Meng et al, 2020 ), autophagy ( Yu J. et al, 2021 ), and immune ( Mao et al, 2021 ) related genes. The information of these six signatures are listed in Supplementary Table S2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S5). Furthermore, the comparison of the constructed model with 7 previously published prognostic models were also conducted [33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. All signatures exhibited excellent prognostic discrimination, with significantly lower survival times observed in the high-risk group compared to the low-risk group (Fig.…”
Section: Validation and Evaluation Of The Novel Model And The Related...mentioning
confidence: 97%