2020
DOI: 10.21769/bioprotoc.3813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction and Validation of A Low-cost, Small-scale, Multiplex Continuous Culturing System for Microorganisms

Abstract: This protocol details the construction of a simple, low-cost, small-scale, multiplex chemostat system designed for the continuous cultivation of microorganisms in suspension (i.e., bacteria, yeast, microalgae). The continuous culture device can operate at a working volume of 25 ml and allows the run of 8 chemostats in parallel by a single person. It provides a platform for parallel, long-term studies of evolution and adaptation of microorganisms under the stress of antimicrobial agents and/or toxic pollutants.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the Miller et al . (2013) ministat system that was designed for yeast, others have applied similar designs to study nutrient limitation in yeast (Skelding et al ., 2018) and antibiotic resistance (Tonoyan et al ., 2020; Toprak et al ., 2013). Others have incorporated multiple sensors or automated controls (Ekkers et al ., 2020; Wong et al ., 2018), but these constitute a considerably larger initial investment in materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to the Miller et al . (2013) ministat system that was designed for yeast, others have applied similar designs to study nutrient limitation in yeast (Skelding et al ., 2018) and antibiotic resistance (Tonoyan et al ., 2020; Toprak et al ., 2013). Others have incorporated multiple sensors or automated controls (Ekkers et al ., 2020; Wong et al ., 2018), but these constitute a considerably larger initial investment in materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used this system to test the intrinsic (see Chapter This system adds to the small, but growing, number of efforts to produce simple but scalable, multiplexed DIY chemostats from cheaper materials that are possible to build and maintain by a single person. In addition to the Miller et al (2013) ministat system that was designed for yeast, others have applied similar designs to study nutrient limitation in yeast (Skelding et al, 2018) and antibiotic resistance (Tonoyan et al, 2020;Toprak et al, 2013). Others have incorporated multiple sensors or automated controls (Ekkers et al, 2020;Wong et al, 2018), but these constitute a considerably larger initial investment in materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here we describe a multiplexed small-scale DIY chemostat array system (dubbed “mesostats”) adapted from the ministat array developed by Miller et al . [ 22 ] to suit experimental evolution of algae, in contrast to the so far described designs specifically intended for yeast [ 21 , 22 , 26 ] and bacterial cultures [ 23 , 27 ]. Our system uses common algal model species Chlamydomonas reinhardtii , with the specific goal to use it as a herbicide resistance evolution model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%