2007
DOI: 10.1002/pssc.200775418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction and purpose of effective field theories for frustrated magnetic order

Abstract: In many fields of physics the discovery of an effective field theory represents a milestone of theoretical progress and sometimes allows analytical answers where otherwise only the brutal power of computers can find structure-less numerical hints. Let us mention nonlinear sigma models where nonlinearly realized symmetries [1] play a central role. Applications to slow dynamics in magnets, to the localizing effects of disorder in Anderson localization and, more recently, as a model for non-equilibrium dynamics o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous publications we found a Langevin-type representation 20,33 for a logarithmic derivative of the order function q(a) with respect to 1/a. This ordinary differential equation (without stochastic field) is much simpler than the exact partial differential equations, which is a consequence of the existence of scaling behavior and of homogeneous functions.…”
Section: Scaling With the Pseudo-dynamical Variable Of Thementioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous publications we found a Langevin-type representation 20,33 for a logarithmic derivative of the order function q(a) with respect to 1/a. This ordinary differential equation (without stochastic field) is much simpler than the exact partial differential equations, which is a consequence of the existence of scaling behavior and of homogeneous functions.…”
Section: Scaling With the Pseudo-dynamical Variable Of Thementioning
confidence: 89%
“…A speciality of RSB is that it appears in the shape of a pseudo-dynamical critical phenomenon 20,27 , which recalls the celebrated dynamical representation of Sompolinsky 32 . A technically important difference however being the absence of a stochastic field, which we reserve for more complicated couplings to faster degrees of freedom 33 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%