2022
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.808969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction and Interpretation of Prediction Model of Teicoplanin Trough Concentration via Machine Learning

Abstract: ObjectiveTo establish an optimal model to predict the teicoplanin trough concentrations by machine learning, and explain the feature importance in the prediction model using the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method.MethodsA retrospective study was performed on 279 therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) measurements obtained from 192 patients who were treated with teicoplanin intravenously at the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University from November 2017 to July 2021. This study included 27 variab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the initially proposed XGBoost model, the reduced performance of our simplified XGBoost model indicated the important influences of these features, particularly the blood sampling time and ALB, on the model output. Nevertheless, a 60.00% IR of the simplified optimum XGBoost model on our external dataset suggested its good forecasting performance, considering the prediction accuracy of the predicted TDM within ±30% of the actual TDM in many similar studies that utilized XGBoost models, ranging from 40% to 75% (Huang et al, 2021b;Guo et al, 2021;Zheng et al, 2021;Ma et al, 2022). Based on the simplified optimum XGBoost model, we designed an easy-to-use web application by using only CYP2C19 genotypes and some noninvasive clinical parameters as an MIPD tool for personalized dosing adjustments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Compared with the initially proposed XGBoost model, the reduced performance of our simplified XGBoost model indicated the important influences of these features, particularly the blood sampling time and ALB, on the model output. Nevertheless, a 60.00% IR of the simplified optimum XGBoost model on our external dataset suggested its good forecasting performance, considering the prediction accuracy of the predicted TDM within ±30% of the actual TDM in many similar studies that utilized XGBoost models, ranging from 40% to 75% (Huang et al, 2021b;Guo et al, 2021;Zheng et al, 2021;Ma et al, 2022). Based on the simplified optimum XGBoost model, we designed an easy-to-use web application by using only CYP2C19 genotypes and some noninvasive clinical parameters as an MIPD tool for personalized dosing adjustments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…After removing duplicated articles, 3,346 studies were screened by the title and/or abstract, 3,175 irrelevant studies were excluded and 171 articles were included for full‐text review. Finally, 64 articles related to precision dosing using ML were included for analysis 11–74 . The PRISMA flow diagram representing the study selection process and review results is presented in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SHAP (https://pypi.org/ project/shap/0.41.0/ (accessed on 1 July 2023), version 0.41.0) was used to interpret the models. SHAP is calculated based on the constructed LightGBM model and an index to explain the machine learning model based on game theory [26,27].…”
Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%