1984
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.4.2.282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction and expression of a recombinant DNA gene encoding a polyomavirus middle-size tumor antigen with the carboxyl terminus of the vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein G.

Abstract: We constructed a molecular clone encoding the N-terminal 379 amino acids of the polyomavirus middlesize tumor antigen, followed by the C-terminal 60 amino acids of the vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein G. This hybrid gene contained the coding region for the C-terminal hydrophobic membrane-spanning domain of the G protein in place of the C-terminal hydrophobic domain of the middle-size tumor antigen. The hybrid gene was expressed in COS-1 cells under the control of the simian virus 40 late promoter. The h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(46 reference statements)
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although extensively studied, the site of mT membrane localization remains unresolved with morphologic studies favouring intracellular membranes (Dilworth et al, 1986;Templeton et al, 1984;Zhu et al, 1984) while biochemical analyses continue to be interpreted as suggesting that kinase active mT containing complexes are located at the plasma membrane (Ballmer-Hofer and Benjamin, 1985;Ito et al, 1977;Scha hausen et al, 1982;Segawa and Ito, 1982). Recently, we have demonstrated a role for cytoskeletal proteins, particularly actin, in the localization of mT (Andrews et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although extensively studied, the site of mT membrane localization remains unresolved with morphologic studies favouring intracellular membranes (Dilworth et al, 1986;Templeton et al, 1984;Zhu et al, 1984) while biochemical analyses continue to be interpreted as suggesting that kinase active mT containing complexes are located at the plasma membrane (Ballmer-Hofer and Benjamin, 1985;Ito et al, 1977;Scha hausen et al, 1982;Segawa and Ito, 1982). Recently, we have demonstrated a role for cytoskeletal proteins, particularly actin, in the localization of mT (Andrews et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subcellular fractionation, immunofluorescence, and immunoelectron microscopy of mT-expressing cells suggest that mT is found in association with subcellular membranes (4,9,18,41,44,47,55). It has been assumed that mT is an integral membrane protein because of a contiguous 22-amino-acid hydrophobic segment near the carboxyl end of the molecule.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it appears that accumulation of the phosphorylated products of the PI-3-kinase is required for transformation (32). Nevertheless, only a fraction of mT molecules in cells are complexed to either the src family kinases or PI-3-kinase; therefore, it remains possible that additional interactions are involved in cellular transformation (23).Subcellular fractionation, immunofluorescence, and immunoelectron microscopy of mT-expressing cells suggest that mT is found in association with subcellular membranes (4,9,18,41,44,47,55). It has been assumed that mT is an integral membrane protein because of a contiguous 22-amino-acid hydrophobic segment near the carboxyl end of the molecule.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without these hydrophobic amino acids, MT no longer binds to membranes, fails to associate with most of the cellular proteins that it normally binds, and does not transform. However, this hydrophobic region does more than simply mediate membrane interaction, as replacement with the membrane targeting domains of vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein G (Templeton et al, 1984), cytochrome b5 (Zhu et al, 1998), or the myristylation signal of pp60 c-src (Elliott et al, 1998) all locate MT to a membrane site, but fail to restore transformation. In addition, mutations within the hydrophobic domain can also abolish transforming activity without disrupting membrane binding (reviewed in Markland and Smith, 1987), and a signi®cant homology exists between the regions in murine and hamster MT.…”
Section: Membrane Bindingmentioning
confidence: 99%