Background
Delivery of effective treatment for pediatric solid tumors poses a particular challenge to centers in middle-income countries (MIC) already vigorously addressing pediatric cancer. This study aimed to improve our understanding of barriers to effective treatment of pediatric solid tumors in MICs.
Methods
An ecological model centering in pediatric sarcoma and expanding to country as the environment were used as benchmark for studying delivery of solid tumor care in MICs. Data on resources was gathered from seven centers members of the Central American Association of Pediatric Hematologists and Oncologists (AHOPCA) using an infrastructure assessment tool. Pediatric sarcoma outcomes data was available and retrieved from hospital-based cancer registries for six of the seven centers and analyzed by country. Patients diagnosed from 1/1/2000-12/31/2009 with osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and other soft tissue sarcomas were included in the analysis. In order to explore correlations between resources and outcomes a pilot performance-index was created.
Findings
Results identified specific human resources, communication, quality and infrastructure deficits. Treatment abandonment rate, metastatic disease at diagnosis, relapse rate and 4-year abandonment-sensitive overall survival (AOS) varied considerably by country (1-38%, 15-54%, 24-52%, 21-51%, respectively). Treatment abandonment rate correlated inversely with health economic expenditure per capita (r= −0.86, p=0.03) and life expectancy at birth (r = −0.93, p=0.007). Four-year AOS correlated inversely with under-5 mortality rate (r= −0.80, p=0.05) and directly with the pilot performance-index (r =0.98, p=0.005).
Interpretation
Initiatives to improve treatment effectiveness of pediatric solid tumor care in MIC and pediatric sarcoma in particular are warranted. Building capacity and infrastructure, improving supportive care and communication, and fostering comprehensive multidisciplinary teams are identified as keystones in Central America. A measure that meaningfully describes performance in delivering pediatric cancer care is feasible and needed to advance comparative prospective analysis of pediatric cancer care and define resource-clusters internationally.