2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construction and evaluation of a primary core collection of apricot germplasm in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expected heterozygosity (0.713) revealed by the SSR markers was also higher than the apricot accessions ( P. armeniaca ) in the Maghreb region (0.593), but similar to the core collection apricot germplasm in China (0.731) [27,28]. As the same wild apricot resource, Siberia apricot has a slightly weaker genetic diversity index than wild apricot in the Ili Valley ( PPB = 91.3% vs. 94.84%) but a larger population size and distribution area.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The expected heterozygosity (0.713) revealed by the SSR markers was also higher than the apricot accessions ( P. armeniaca ) in the Maghreb region (0.593), but similar to the core collection apricot germplasm in China (0.731) [27,28]. As the same wild apricot resource, Siberia apricot has a slightly weaker genetic diversity index than wild apricot in the Ili Valley ( PPB = 91.3% vs. 94.84%) but a larger population size and distribution area.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Arabidopsis thaliania [29], Oryza sativa [30], Triticum aestivum [31] and Zea mays [32], and perennial species, e.g. Annona cherimola [33], Malus domestica [34], Prunus armeniaca [35] and Vitis vinifera [36], using different eco-geographical, agro-morphological, biochemical or molecular data. Despite the many approaches used to design core collections that optimize the genetic distance between accessions and/or the allelic diversity [37][44], most of core collections have been constructed based on the so-called maximizing method (M-method) [37] through the M strat program [40] by optimizing the number of alleles/trait classes for germplasm conservation purposes, whereas core sizes depend on the number of accessions and the diversity available in the base collections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this conservation context, the use of molecular markers to achieve the representativeness definition of a core collection is important because population persistence and resilience to environmental changes are usually positively correlated with genetic diversity. Methodologically, efforts to create germplasm core collections commonly use statistical and clustering methods (Holbrook et al 1993;Li et al 2004;Laghetti et al 2008;Wang et al 2011;Zhang et al 2011;Belaj et al 2012;Mei et al 2012;Rao et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%