2015
DOI: 10.1134/s2075113315040097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing the pair interaction potentials of iron atoms with other metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At further thermal expansion above the melting temperature, the resistance to expansion decreases. The trough of the Lennard-Jones potential is lower at higher temperatures [ 34 ]. Above boiling temperature, even a collapse of the system would be energetically possible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At further thermal expansion above the melting temperature, the resistance to expansion decreases. The trough of the Lennard-Jones potential is lower at higher temperatures [ 34 ]. Above boiling temperature, even a collapse of the system would be energetically possible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs. [ 8 , 34 ]) was applied, including additional consideration of long-range retractive Coulomb forces between the atoms to consider the complex metallic structure [ 35 ]. The starting points of the 10 × 10 × 10 atoms lattice is the arrangement at atom distances based on the actual temperature for the whole lattice considering a linear coefficient of thermal expansion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The L-J potential parameters between carbon atoms given by Stuart et al 20) are σ = 3.40 Å, ε = 0.00284 eV. The parameters of the L-J potential function between iron atoms suggested by Filippova et al 22) are σ = 2.2674 Å, ε = 0.70641 eV. According to the combining rules the L-J potential function interaction between Fe-C atoms is calculated as: The physical model of molten iron with carbon is constructed on the basis of pure iron model, which was used in our previous work.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Innumerous works have employed force fields that are not a natural choice for the class of materials they study. Filippova et al [ 15 ] performed parametrizations using the Lennard-Jones interatomic interaction model for determining pair interactions between iron atoms and other metals, instead of using EAM or MEAM. Pratt et al [ 7 ] performed nanoindentation MD simulations using different force field types and showed how force fields that would not be a natural choice for FCC aluminum could be applicable for it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%