2016
DOI: 10.1017/mag.2016.28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing the 15th pentagon that tiles the plane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in the 2D tessellation, the sum of angles around a multi-cellular junction must equal 360°. Furthermore, the mathematical laws of 2D tessellation suggested that the geometry of individual cells is not random, especially when the tessellation was characterized by specific distributions of polygonal cells and the average number of sides approached 6 as the number of cells increased ( Aboav, 1980 ; Grünbaum & Shephard, 1987 ; Lewis, 1928 ; Lord, 2016 ; Weaire & Rivier, 1984 ). Therefore, if the geometry of individual cells were random or controlled only by each cell itself, then it would be quite possible that a group of cells would not tile a flat plane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, in the 2D tessellation, the sum of angles around a multi-cellular junction must equal 360°. Furthermore, the mathematical laws of 2D tessellation suggested that the geometry of individual cells is not random, especially when the tessellation was characterized by specific distributions of polygonal cells and the average number of sides approached 6 as the number of cells increased ( Aboav, 1980 ; Grünbaum & Shephard, 1987 ; Lewis, 1928 ; Lord, 2016 ; Weaire & Rivier, 1984 ). Therefore, if the geometry of individual cells were random or controlled only by each cell itself, then it would be quite possible that a group of cells would not tile a flat plane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two basic mathematical generalizations were found to underlie the tessellations in which only one kind of polygon was used to tile a flat plane (Grünbaum & Shephard, 1987; Lord, 2016): 1. Any kind of polygon with more than 6 sides would be unable to form a close tile pattern on a flat plane; 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the mathematical laws of 2D tessellation suggested that the geometry of individual cells is not random, especially when the tessellation was characterized by specific distributions of polygonal cells and the average number of sides approached 6 as the number of cells increased (Aboav 1980;Grünbaum & Shephard 1987;Lewis 1928;Lord 2016;Weaire & Rivier 1984). So, if the geometry of individual cells were random or controlled only by each cell itself, then it would be quite possible that a group of cells would not tile a flat plane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three laws were here generalized for the analysis of general topological properties of 2D tessellation: Euler's law (faces -edges + vertex = 1), Lewis' law (the relationship between mean area of a convex n-sided cell and n) and Aboav-Weaire law (Aboav 1980) (the relationship between the mean number of sides of neighboring cells of a convex n-sided cell and n) (Aboav 1980;Lewis 1928;Sanchez-Gutierrez et al 2016;Weaire & Rivier 1984). Two basic mathematical generalizations were found to underlie the tessellations in which only one kind of polygon was used to tile a flat plane (Grünbaum & Shephard 1987;Lord 2016): 1. Any kind of polygon with more than 6 sides would be unable to form a close tile pattern on a flat plane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%