1992
DOI: 10.1017/s0068246200009818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing reconstruction: claim and reality of Roman rebuilding inscriptions from the Latin west

Abstract: COSTRUENDO RICOSTRUZIONI: RIVENDICAZIONI E REALTÀ DELLE ISCRIZIONI DA RIEDIFICAZIONI ROMANE PROVENIENTI DAL LATINUM OCCIDENTALEIn quest'articolo gli Autori analizzano l'atteggiamento che in epoca romana veniva riservato alia riedificazione e al restauro di edifici, utilizzando in particolare le iscrizioni di riedificazione rinvenute nella parte occidentale dell'Impero (Roma esclusa); inoltre, dove possibile, le iscrizioni sono confrontate con le evidenze archeologiche. Viene dimostrato qui che non sempre tali … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…See, similarly, Leone 2007; Rambaldi 2009. Arguing for keeping these data-sets apart: Eck 1999; Kleinwächter 2001: 10–18; Thomas and Witschel 1992: 136; Witschel 2004: 257. Very few inscriptions were found in situ.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See, similarly, Leone 2007; Rambaldi 2009. Arguing for keeping these data-sets apart: Eck 1999; Kleinwächter 2001: 10–18; Thomas and Witschel 1992: 136; Witschel 2004: 257. Very few inscriptions were found in situ.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 44 Thomas 2007: 78; Thomas and Witschel (1992: 140–2) on the ‘fragility’ of a building as ‘signs for the memory’.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reality of these situations is borne out in rebuilding inscriptions, especially rich from Italy; see Ward-Perkins 1984; see also Pobjoy 2000 for Republican rebuilding inscriptions. Thomas and Witschel (1992: 143–9) elaborate on the terminology of dilapidation, which they consider to be ‘notional’ (1992: 155) devices that served ‘to create something of a “historic monuments” mentality’ (1992: 169). Fagan (1996: 81–93) discusses the commonness of repairs and embellishments by other patrons but disagrees with Thomas and Witschel's idea of notional terminology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I can add CIL XIV S 4721 (fourth-century Ostia). For the rhetorical nature of this language, which often served as part of the dedicator's self-presentation and not necessarily as an accurate description of the urban context at the time, see now: Thomas and Witschel, 1992; Saatsamoinen, 2010. Géza Alföldy (2001) took a more pessimistic reading of the evidence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%