The expression of immunohistochemical markers that have been used in diagnosis and/or prognostication of urothelial tumors in humans (uroplakin III [UPIII], cytokeratin 7 [CK7], cyclooxygenase-2 [COX-2], and activated caspase 3) was evaluated in a series of 99 canine proliferative urothelial lesions of the urinary bladder and compared to the lesion classification and grade as defined by the World Health Organization / International Society of Urologic Pathology consensus system. There were significant associations between tumor classification and overall UPIII pattern (P ¼ 1.49 Â 10 -18 ), loss of UPIII (P ¼ 1.27 Â 10 -4 ), overall CK7 pattern (P ¼ 4.34 Â 10 -18 ), and COX-2 pattern (P ¼ 8.12 Â 10 -25). In addition, there were significant associations between depth of neoplastic cell infiltration into the urinary bladder wall and overall UPIII pattern (P ¼ 1.54 Â 10 ). There were no significant associations between tumor classification or infiltration and caspase 3 expression pattern.Keywords dog, urinary bladder, oncology, immunohistochemistry, transitional cell carcinoma, uroplakin III, neoplasia, cytokeratin Proliferative lesions of the urothelium of the canine urinary bladder range from benign polyps and papillomas to carcinomas with varying metastatic potential. Also, inflammatory conditions such as polypoid cystitis can form tumor-like masses within the urinary bladder that can be confused with urothelial neoplasms. Classification of urothelial proliferative lesions and histologic grading of urothelial carcinomas is key to accurate prognostication and treatment selection. A classification and grading scheme based on the 1986 World Health Organization (WHO) classification scheme for human urinary bladder and urethral cancer was proposed in 1995 for use in evaluating urothelial neoplasms in dogs based on pattern of growth, nuclear atypia, and degree of infiltration into the urinary bladder wall. 50 In the initial description of this system's use in dogs, significant correlations were found between tumor grade and depth of infiltration, the presence of metastases, and survival time. However, a subsequent smaller study failed to find a significant correlation between grade and prognosis. 41 To our knowledge, this scheme is not widely used in dogs and has been replaced in human medicine by more modern classification schemes. There remains a need for a clear, reproducible, and well-accepted classification and grading scheme for urothelial proliferative lesions in dogs.Currently, the most widely accepted scheme for classification and grading of proliferative urothelial lesions in humans is the WHO / International Society of Urologic Pathology (ISUP) consensus classification system, published in 1998 and updated in 2004. 6,7 In multiple studies, the WHO/ISUP consensus classification system has been demonstrated to be significantly associated with clinical outcome. 2,[32][33][34]37,42,43,51,59 It has long been known that canine urothelial neoplasms are similar to urothelial neoplasms in humans in terms o...