2012
DOI: 10.1155/2012/164752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing Potential Energy Surfaces for Polyatomic Systems: Recent Progress and New Problems

Abstract: Different methods of constructing potential energy surfaces in polyatomic systems are reviewed, with the emphasis put on fitting, interpolation, and analytical (defined by functional forms) approaches, based on quantum chemistry electronic structure calculations. The different approaches are reviewed first, followed by a comparison using the benchmark H + CH 4 and the H + NH 3 gas-phase hydrogen abstraction reactions. Different kinetics and dynamics properties are analyzed for these reactions and compared with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
(176 reference statements)
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the different methods developed in the literature for the construction of potential energy surfaces, a feasible alternative approach that has been extensively applied by our group is the construction of analytical potential energy surfaces based on known functional forms. 4,5 The title reaction has been little studied, whether experimentally or theoretically. This may be because the chemistry of the reaction of ammonia with chlorine atoms is very complex with many intermediate fast reactions being involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the different methods developed in the literature for the construction of potential energy surfaces, a feasible alternative approach that has been extensively applied by our group is the construction of analytical potential energy surfaces based on known functional forms. 4,5 The title reaction has been little studied, whether experimentally or theoretically. This may be because the chemistry of the reaction of ammonia with chlorine atoms is very complex with many intermediate fast reactions being involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 15 All such strategies have positive sides and drawbacks, depending on the size of the system to be studied, the required simulation time, and the quality of the predictions. 1 , 16 , 17 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As other authors have noted, such methods fall broadly into two categories: interpolation and fitting methods. 16,17 Interpolative methods include sparse interpolation based on the Smolyak algorithm with either a polynomial or trigonometric basis, 18,19 modified Shepard interpolation, 12,20−22 and (possibly local) interpolative moving least-squares (IMLS/L-IMLS). 23−25 Noninterpolative fittingbased methods include the (double) many-body expansion (MBE/DMBE), 26−28 moving least-squares (MLS) fitting, 29 permutationally invariant PES by least-squares fitting (PIP), 30−35 the valence bond (VB) functional form, 36−38 and neural network PESs (nn-PES).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%