2017
DOI: 10.1017/s0950268817000760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing Ebola transmission chains from West Africa and estimating model parameters using internet sources

Abstract: SUMMARY During the recent Ebola crisis in West Africa, individual person-level details of disease onset, transmissions, and outcomes such as survival or death were reported in online news media. We set out to document disease transmission chains for Ebola, with the goal of generating a timely account that could be used for surveillance, mathematical modeling, and public health decision-making. By accessing public web pages only, such as locally produced newspapers and blogs, we created a transmission chain inv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we assume linearity in our results, we find that, by our model, every extra hour travelled increases rate of detection but 0.2505%, 0.0633% and 0.0028% for the 0 - 14 day, 0 - 7 day and 0 - 3 day exposure windows respectively, representing a significant difference. This difference most likely stems from the distribution of incubation periods, which in [13], is quoted as having a mean of 9.1 days with a SD of 7.3, with no indication as to how this is distributed, compared to our distribution (taken from [16]) which has mean of 12.5 days and a SD of 4.35.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If we assume linearity in our results, we find that, by our model, every extra hour travelled increases rate of detection but 0.2505%, 0.0633% and 0.0028% for the 0 - 14 day, 0 - 7 day and 0 - 3 day exposure windows respectively, representing a significant difference. This difference most likely stems from the distribution of incubation periods, which in [13], is quoted as having a mean of 9.1 days with a SD of 7.3, with no indication as to how this is distributed, compared to our distribution (taken from [16]) which has mean of 12.5 days and a SD of 4.35.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Tabulated results of border screening model’s output (right column) for varying parameter inputs. The parameterisation of the disease incubation distributions of Ebola[10], SARS[11] and Influenza[12] have been calculated/taken from existing academic literature (see supplementary text)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on vacation), or more longer term (such as being a resident). Flight times are sampled from the ranges [3,5], [7,9] and [11,13] to model where travellers are required to take a short, medium or long-haul flight from country A to country B. Lastly, we consider quarantine periods which involves either 3, 5, 7, 10 or 14 days of self-isolation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These times are sampled from the distributions D exp , D inc and D flight respectively, each of which varies depending on the scenario being considered. The incubation distributions for influenza, SARS, COVID-19 and Ebola have been taken from the works [2]–[5] respectively, just as in [1]. To extend our previous work, travellers that successfully arrive into country B undetected must then undergo self-isolation for a fixed period, T iso .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation