2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2015.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing chronologies in Viking Age Iceland: Increasing dating resolution using Bayesian approaches

Abstract: Bradford Scholars -how to deposit your paper Overview Copyright check• Check if your publisher allows submission to a repository.• Use the Sherpa RoMEO database if you are not sure about your publisher's position or email openaccess@bradford.ac.uk.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2013) with a local delta-R of 111 ± 14 C years taken for Northern Iceland (Ascough et al. 2007; Batt et al. 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2013) with a local delta-R of 111 ± 14 C years taken for Northern Iceland (Ascough et al. 2007; Batt et al. 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Norse of the Viking Age (∼700‒1050 AD) were the first people to settle permanently in Iceland around 870 AD (Eldjárn 1956; Einarsson 1995, 2019; Batt et al. 2015; Zori 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wealth of new archaeological data in Iceland, as well as methodological advances in Bayesian analysis, now make it possible to critically reassess the chronological evidence relating to the settlement of Iceland and to aim for a much improved resolution of the timing and pattern of colonisation within the Viking Age (e.g. Batt et al, 2015).…”
Section: Archaeological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A ∆R value of 111 ± 10 14 C years has been obtained from multiple paired measurements on terrestrial mammals and marine molluscs from Viking Age archaeological deposits in northern Iceland, and is used here (Ascough et al 2007). Although 111 ± 10 14 C is currently the best estimate, Batt et al (2015) suggest it could be improved through evaluation of other parts in Iceland.…”
Section: Reservoir Offsetsmentioning
confidence: 99%