Constructions of Disorder: Meaning-Making Frameworks for Psychotherapy.
DOI: 10.1037/10368-007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing and deconstructing transitive diagnosis.

Abstract: The destabilization created by the rapid pace, ease of communication, and mixing of cultures and viewpoints that characterize the postmodern world is perhaps nowhere more apparent than in the raging controversies about health care. Psychologists and the public are alarmed by the threat of diluted access to high-quality mental health care. Concerns about cost containment, efficacy, and accountability will continue to be constraints for the practitioner, and they have forced a basic review of nearly every aspect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead of asking, “What does such a response mean, generally?” the constructivist assessor is likely to ask, “What does such a response mean to this particular client ?” In asking the latter question, a shift is made from a nomothetic to an idiographic model (Aronow et al, 1995); each client's personal knowledge scheme (i.e., construct system) is assessed. Dispositional assessment (Faidley & Leitner, 1993; Leitner & Faidley, 1995; Leitner, Faidley, & Celentana, 2000), transitive diagnosis (Johnson, Pfenninger, & Klion, 2000), and narrative approaches to psychology and psychotherapy (Eron & Lund, 1996; Gonçalves, Korman, & Angus, 2000; White & Epston, 1990) exemplify these more idiographic approaches.…”
Section: Difference As Dysfunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of asking, “What does such a response mean, generally?” the constructivist assessor is likely to ask, “What does such a response mean to this particular client ?” In asking the latter question, a shift is made from a nomothetic to an idiographic model (Aronow et al, 1995); each client's personal knowledge scheme (i.e., construct system) is assessed. Dispositional assessment (Faidley & Leitner, 1993; Leitner & Faidley, 1995; Leitner, Faidley, & Celentana, 2000), transitive diagnosis (Johnson, Pfenninger, & Klion, 2000), and narrative approaches to psychology and psychotherapy (Eron & Lund, 1996; Gonçalves, Korman, & Angus, 2000; White & Epston, 1990) exemplify these more idiographic approaches.…”
Section: Difference As Dysfunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…J. Neimeyer, 1993). In contrast to traditional diagnostic systems such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (American Psychiatric Association, 2022) and the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (World Health Organization, 2021), that assign clients to nomothetic medical-model categories of disorder, personal construct psychology assesses clients idiographically by identifying and evaluating across time ongoing changes in their personal constructsa process known as transitive diagnosis ( Johnson et al, 2000;Raskin, 2021). For introductions to personal construct theory, see Bannister andFransella (1986/2019), Kelly (1963), and Epting et al (2002.…”
Section: Personal Construct Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiencing chaos and disorder is a prerequisite for major life transformations ( Bussolari & Goodell, 2009 ; Johnson et al, 2000 ; Erdős, 2018 ). This is a liminal feature that is functional in initiation and healing rites and facilitates substantial identity deconstruction and reconstruction (see Table 1 ).…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%