Constructing Achievement in the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY): A Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis

Abstract

The International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia (ICTY) was established by the UN Security Council in 1993 to prosecute persons responsible for war crimes committed in the former Yugoslavia during the Balkan wars. As the first international war crimes tribunal since the Nuremburg and Tokyo tribunals set up after WWII, the ICTY has attracted immense interest among legal scholars since its inception, but has failed to garner the same level of attention from researchers in other disciplines, notably linguistics. This represents a significant research gap, as the Tribunal's public discourse (notably its case law and Annual Reports) can open up interesting avenues of analysis to researchers of law, language, and legal discourse alike. On its official website, the Tribunal claims that it has ''irreversibly changed the landscape of international humanitarian law'' and lists six specific achievements: ''Holding leaders accountable; bringing justice to victims; giving victims a voice; establishing the facts; developing international law and strengthening the rule of the law''. While a number of legal scholars have studied and critiqued the level of 'achievement' actually attained by the Tribunal against these metrics and others, of interest to linguists is the ways in which this work might be conveyed discursively. In this paper, we demonstrate how methods from the linguistic field of corpus-based critical discourse analysis can be utilised to explore the discursive construction of such achievements in the language of the ICTY.

Data-Driven Futures of International Refugee Law

“…Previous studies have found broad correlation between specific events (such as the September 11 terrorist attacks) and overall rates of asylum acceptance (Neumayer 2005;Rottman et al 2009). More computationally driven approaches have used sentiment analysis to examine the role of a discourse of 'achievement' in the case law of a court (Potts and Kjaer 2016). NLP has similarly been used to examine how courts grapple with politically sensitive issues (Busch and Pelc 2019).…”

Corpus Linguistics in Legal Discourse

“…The corpus-assisted approach marks an emerging characteristic of current Corpus Linguistics, which is that it supports and is supported by other approaches to language. For example, Potts and Kjaer [87] combine Corpus Linguistics methods with Critical Discourse Analysis [30] to explore how 'achievements' are discursively constructed in the texts created by the International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia. The combination includes quantitative corpus linguistic methods, which help to quantify, visualize and detect patterns of meaning in data, and a qualitative theory of Critical Discourse Analysis useful for shaping and informing the explorations of the quantitative results.…”

Mother, Monster, Mrs, I: A Critical Evaluation of Gendered Naming Strategies in English Sentencing Remarks of Women Who Kill

“…[22]) or analysis of the 'voice' of Tribunals (e.g. [41]). Therefore, this article illustrates some of the latest work being undertaken at the legal-linguistic interface.…”