2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-012-0412-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructing a social vulnerability index to earthquake hazards using a hybrid factor analysis and analytic network process (F’ANP) model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar variables had been adopted in existing SVI studies. 14,[17][18][19]37 The higher the percentage of older people with disabilities, the larger the SVI.…”
Section: Disabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar variables had been adopted in existing SVI studies. 14,[17][18][19]37 The higher the percentage of older people with disabilities, the larger the SVI.…”
Section: Disabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,12 Most SVIs include the number or percentage of older people as one of the variables. [13][14][15][16][17][18] Since the older population is a heterogeneous subgroup with different levels of vulnerability, there is a need to go beyond merely describing this group by its population size and more deeply examine the characteristics of this high-risk subgroup. Despite the rapidly aging population, the ratio of the older population to the whole population still constitutes a minority.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to effectively reduce the adverse effects of a flood disaster, it is necessary to enhance the understanding of the social vulnerability of flood-hazard-prone areas (Cutter et al, 2003Zhang and You, 2014). Since Cutter developed a social vulnerability index to measure the social vulnerability to environmental hazards (Cutter et al, 2003), there has been growing concern and interest in this area (Bjarnadottir et al, 2011;Noriega and Ludwig, 2012;Zebardast, 2013;Siagian et al, 2014;Garbutt et al, 2015). For example, Noriega and Ludwig (2012) assessed the social vulnerability to local earthquake risk in Los Angeles County, California, United States, and they found that "knowledge of the relationship between earthquake hazard and the demographic characteristics of people in the area at risk is essential to mitigate the local impact from earthquakes".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second factor is the structure and materials of buildings, which are related to property losses and casualties directly or indirectly. The third factor is individual characteristics, including socioeconomic status (income, political power and prestige), gender, age, education and cultural background (Zebardast 2013;Gabriela and Lisa 2012). These individual characteristics are related to the reaction of people when facing disasters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%